Submit Manuscript

The Muscular Fascia as a Mechanobiological and Stem-Cell Compartment: An Umbrella Review of Its Biology, Pathology, Diagnostics and Therapeutics

  1. Home
  2. Articles

The Muscular Fascia as a Mechanobiological and Stem-Cell Compartment: An Umbrella Review of Its Biology, Pathology, Diagnostics and Therapeutics

Journal of Clinical Practice and Medical Case Report | Volume 3, Issue 1 | October 2026
 

Márcio Hiroaki Kume¹*, Bianca Furlan², Camila Gobatto Boaventura², Mônica Andréa Probst², Edson Peracchi² and Carmen Austrália Paredes Marcondes Ribas3

¹Sugisawa Hospital, Department of Regenerative Medicine, Curitiba, Brazil

²CeUnina, Department of Biologic Science, Curitiba, Brazil

3Mackenzie University, Curitiba, Brazil

*Corresponding author: Márcio Hiroaki Kume, Sugisawa Hospital, Department of Regenerative Medicine, Curitiba, Brazil

Citation: Kume MH, Furlan B, Boaventura CG, Probst MA, Peracchi E, et al. The Muscular Fascia as a Mechanobiological and Stem-Cell Compartment: An Umbrella Review of Its Biology, Pathology, Diagnostics and Therapeutics. J Clin Pract Med Case Rep. 3(1):1-26.

Received: September 10, 2026 | Published: October 16, 2026

Copyright© 2026 Genesis Pub by Kume MH, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are properly credited.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.52793/JCPMCR.2026.3(1)-40

Abstract

Background: Muscular (deep) fascia has moved from an anatomical afterthought to a candidate organ with its own resident cell types, matrix chemistry, innervation, progenitor populations and disease spectrum. The evidence base is now large but fragmented: basic mechanobiology, single-cell transcriptomics, stem-cell and regenerative science, diagnostic imaging and a very large therapeutic trial literature are reviewed almost entirely in separate silos.

Objective: To produce the most complete synthesis to date of the fascia literature by combining an umbrella review of published systematic reviews and meta-analyses with a structured narrative synthesis of the primary cellular, progenitor and mechanobiological evidence, and to define what is genuinely established, what is contested and what is absent.

Methods. We assembled an inventory of 104 review-level evidence records addressing fascia biology, fascia-related diagnoses and fascia-directed interventions, together with primary sources covering fascial histology, hyaluronan biology, innervation, force transmission, mechanotransduction, progenitor biology and tissue engineering. Every quantitative value reported here was taken from a retrieved source record; values that could not be confirmed are reported as not available rather than estimated. All references were screened for retraction, correction, editor’s note or expression of concern.

Results: Deep fascia is a layered composite of roughly 1 mm thickness with two to three collagen sublayers separated by hyaluronan-rich loose connective-tissue interlayers of about 43 µm. It contains a distinct hyaluronan-producing cell, the fasciacyte, comprising approximately 30% of fibroblast-like cells, alongside telocytes, mast cells and a regionally variable and generally sparse myofibroblast population. Fascia hosts a CD201-positive multipotent progenitor that choreographs injury repair, and the muscle-associated fascial compartment hosts fibro-adipogenic progenitors that are indispensable for satellite-cell-mediated regeneration yet drive fibro-fatty degeneration when dysregulated. Both available humans deep-fascia single-cell datasets come from surgical disease and both converge on a macrophage-centred rather than myofibroblast-centred fibrotic programme. Clinically, fascial thickening replicates across imaging studies whereas reduced shear strain does not, and the palpatory diagnosis on which much of the therapeutic literature rests has an interrater kappa of 0.452. Therapeutically, no fascia-directed intervention is supported by high-certainty evidence; extracorporeal shockwave therapy is the only modality with both medium- and long-term effect in the largest network, corticosteroid effects are marginal against their own minimal important difference, and only one adequately powered placebo-controlled randomised trial of an orthobiologic in a fascial disease exists.

Conclusion: Fascia is best understood as a mechanically gated progenitor and immune compartment rather than as inert packing tissue. The principal obstacle to translation is not a shortage of trials but the absence of a validated case definition, a healthy human single-cell reference atlas, and any first-in-human trial of a fascia-derived cellular product.

Keywords

Fascia; Mechanotransduction; Fibro-adipogenic progenitors; Hyaluronan; Myofascial pain; Umbrella review.

Introduction

For most of the modern anatomical era, fascia was what had to be removed before dissection could begin. That framing has collapsed over the last two decades under the weight of three converging literatures. The first is histological and demonstrates that deep fascia is not a homogeneous membrane but a layered composite with its own resident cell types and a site-specific matrix chemistry [1]. The second is neurophysiological and demonstrates that fascia is more densely innervated than the muscle it invests and, under experimental chemical stimulation, more painful [3]. The third, and the one that motivates publication of this synthesis in a stem-cell journal, is developmental and regenerative: fascia has been shown to contain a multipotent progenitor that supplies the cells and the pre-assembled matrix of scar, and the muscle-associated fascial compartment contains the fibro-adipogenic progenitor population without which satellite cells cannot efficiently regenerate muscle [5-8].

The problem is no longer scarcity of data but fragmentation. Reviews of fascial manual therapy do not discuss fasciacyte biology; single-cell papers on fascial fibrosis do not engage with the imaging literature that defines the clinical phenotype; and the large trial literature on plantar fasciopathy and myofascial pain rarely interrogates whether the diagnostic label being treated can be applied reproducibly. We identified six existing umbrella-level products in this domain, every one organised around a single modality — needling, instrument-assisted mobilisation, rolling, cupping or photobiomodulation — or a single diagnosis, most often plantar fasciitis [9-14]. To our knowledge no synthesis integrates fascial cell and progenitor biology, anatomical continuity, matrix chemistry, diagnostic reliability and the full therapeutic review base within a single evidentiary frame.

This review sets out to do that. Its organising claim is that fascia is most usefully understood as a mechanically gated progenitor and immune compartment: a tissue whose resident stromal and progenitor cells read mechanical and chemical state through a conserved transduction axis, and whose diseases are the pathological settings of that axis. We hold that claim to the same evidentiary standard as the therapeutic literature, distinguishing mechanism from outcome, regulatory designation from demonstrated efficacy, and absence of evidence from evidence of absence.

Materials and Methods

Design and reporting

This is an umbrella review — a systematic review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses — combined with a structured narrative synthesis of primary evidence in domains where review-level evidence does not yet exist, principally fascial cell biology, progenitor biology and tissue engineering. The hybrid design is deliberate and is itself a finding: the therapeutic literature is review-saturated while the biological literature is not yet review-ready.

Evidence sources and eligibility

Searches covered MEDLINE/PubMed, publisher platforms and registry records, together with regulatory databases of the United States Food and Drug Administration, the European Medicines Agency and Health Canada. Review-level records were eligible if they were systematic reviews, meta-analyses, network meta-analyses, scoping reviews with a stated search strategy, or umbrella reviews addressing fascia biology, a fascia-related diagnosis or a fascia-directed intervention. Primary records were eligible for the narrative strand if they reported original human or animal data on fascial anatomy, histology, cell populations, matrix composition, innervation, force transmission, mechanotransduction, progenitor biology or fascial tissue engineering. Protocols without results and reviews without a reproducible search strategy were flagged as non-systematic rather than counted as review-level evidence.

Data handling and verification rules

Three rules governed extraction. Every quantitative value reported here was taken from a retrieved source record; values that could not be confirmed are reported as not available rather than estimated, which applies to several parameters a reader might expect, including matrix metalloproteinase, tissue inhibitor and interleukin-6 concentrations in human deep fascia. Every included reference was screened for retraction, correction, editor’s note or expression of concern.

That screen returned material results, stated here rather than buried. One paper is retracted and is not cited anywhere in this review for any claim: a 2012 report on Dupuytren stem cells, retracted in 2025. One further Dupuytren paper carries an expression of concern and is likewise not used. A lysyl-oxidase and stiffness paper widely cited in the mechanobiology literature carries an Editor’s Note and is used only for the general principle of crosslinking-dependent stiffening [15]. Two foundational papers carry author corrections which do not affect the science and which are cited alongside the primary record: the CD201-positive fascia progenitor paper [5,16] and the interstitium paper [17].

Quality appraisal

Where included reviews reported AMSTAR-2 or GRADE assessments, those are carried forward verbatim and reported alongside effect estimates, because in this field the certainty rating frequently contradicts the headline effect size.

Ethics and transparency

This work is a review of previously published literature. It involved no human participants, no identifiable human data and no animal experimentation, and therefore did not require approval by a research ethics committee or institutional review board; under Brazilian National Health Council Resolutions 466/2012 and 510/2016 such reviews fall outside the scope of mandatory ethics review. Artificial-intelligence tools assisted with literature retrieval, reference formatting and language editing; all scientific content and interpretation are the responsibility of the author.

Results

What fascia is: three definitions that are not interchangeable

Any complete review must begin by conceding that the field does not share one definition. Terminologia Anatomica, adopted by the fortieth edition of Gray’s Anatomy, treats fasciae as dissectible sheets and recognises no body-wide system [19]. The Fascia Research Congress deliberately widened the term to a tissue type encompassing all collagenous soft connective tissues [20]. The FASCIA Nomenclature Committee ran a three-round Delphi process with 21 experts and produced two complementary definitions rather than one: a structural definition of a fascia as a dissectible aggregation of connective tissue, and a functional definition of the fascial system as a three-dimensional continuum spanning adipose tissue, aponeuroses, epineurium, joint capsules, ligaments, meninges, retinacula, tendons and all intramuscular connective tissues [19]. A recent organ-based proposal reframes the system as four anatomical organs — superficial, musculoskeletal, visceral and neural fascia — each built from two recurring layer types, one collagenous and stiff, one hyaluronan-rich and viscous [21]. That two-layer formulation is the most useful bridge from histology to function and is the one adopted here.

The consequence for appraisal is not cosmetic: a trial recruiting on “myofascial pain”, a histology study of “deep fascia” and a meta-analysis of “fascial manual therapy” may not describe the same tissue, and heterogeneity attributed to method may in part be heterogeneity of referent.

Architecture and quantitative morphology

Across 72 human limb specimens, deep fascia averaged approximately 1 mm in thickness and comprised two to three layers of densely packed parallel collagen bundles of differing fibre orientation, separated by loose connective tissue; nerve fibres were present in every specimen [1]. In ten crural fascia dissections, mean total thickness was 924 µm across three collagenous sublayers averaging 277.6 µm, separated by loose interlayers of 43 µm, with anisotropic behaviour and crimped collagen [22]. Deep fascia divides histologically into aponeurotic fascia — thick, multilayered, poorly adherent to muscle, as in the fascia lata, crural fascia, thoracolumbar fascia and rectus sheath — and epimysial fascia, thinner, elastin-richer and intimately adherent to muscle; elastic fibres constitute roughly 15% of epimysial fascia versus less than 1% of aponeurotic fascia [1].

Superficial fascia is thinner, and measurement modality matters: ultrasound systematically overestimates it, giving 420–520 µm at the thigh against 146.6 ± 31.5 µm by histology, although the two correlate at r = 0.918 [23]. Fascial thickness correlates with body mass at Kendall tau 0.45–0.75 [2], and a systematic review of 38 thoracolumbar ultrasound studies identified L2–L3 as the optimal assessment level [24].

Aging changes fascia in opposite directions in different regions, which is one reason that pooled “fascial stiffness” constructs mislead: lower-limb fascial thickness decreases by 12.3–25.8% with age while low-back fascial thickness increases by 40.0–76.7% [2,25]. In aged mice, whole-muscle collagen rose from 2.95 ± 0.46% to 9.29 ± 0.81% while hyaluronan-binding-protein optical density fell — more collagen and less hyaluronan around proprioceptors with age [26].

Resident cells: the fasciacyte and its neighbours

The single most consequential cell-biological advance in this field is the identification of the fasciacyte. Formally characterised in 2018 as a cell devoted to the regulation of fascial gliding, fasciacytes are rounder and shorter-processed than classical fibroblasts, cluster along the loose connective-tissue surfaces of the collagen sublayers, stain with Alcian blue and anti-hyaluronan-binding protein, are vimentin-positive, CD68-negative and S100A4-positive, and express HAS2 messenger RNA, identifying them as the principal local hyaluronan producers [27]. They constitute approximately 30% of the fibroblast-like cells of deep fascia [2].

Electron microscopy of human fascia lata identified telocytes with a mean cell-body diameter of 9.39 ± 3.26 µm and telopodes up to about 22 µm; per field, tissue contained 3–6 fibroblasts, 0–4 mast cells, 0–2 myofibroblastic cells and 0–2 telocytes [29]. CD34-positive stromal cells and telocytes are proposed as a distributed tissue reserve and principal source of mesenchymal cells [30], and telocytes have been described in human skeletal muscle and in fibrotic settings [31-33]. Whether they are a distinct lineage or a morphological state of fibro-adipogenic progenitors remains unresolved.

Mast cells are present at 20.4 ± 9.4 per square millimetre in human superficial fascia, with 51 ± 9.7% lying among collagen fibres and about a quarter in close relation to nerve fibres — an anatomical substrate for neurogenic inflammation [23,34]. Myofibroblast density, by contrast, is low and strongly regional: median 1.52% in lumbar fascia against 0% in both plantar fascia and fascia lata, with H(2) = 14.0, p < 0.01 [2,35].

That regional distribution disciplines the contractility hypothesis. Fascia contracts in vitro in response to the thromboxane analogue U46619, caffeine and angiotensin II, with blockade by cytochalasin D, SQ-29548 and the Rho-kinase inhibitor Y-27632 [35]. Contractions over seconds to minutes are too weak to contribute to joint stability, whereas sustained changes over days to months can produce contracture [37]. The autonomic link is plausible given that roughly 40% of fascial innervation is postganglionic sympathetic [2,38]. But contractility is a regional, not a general, property.

Single-cell transcriptomics: fascial fibrosis is macrophage-centred

Only two single-cell datasets of human deep fascia exist, and both come from surgical disease. In acute compartment syndrome, six patients yielded 53,116 cells after quality control, resolving fibroblasts, endothelial cells, smooth-muscle cells, mast cells, myeloid, T and B cells and cycling cells [39]. In gluteal muscle contracture, 14 fascial samples yielded 86,159 cells; fibroblasts comprised 66.8 ± 17.7% and macrophages 8.5 ± 7.0% of cells, with macrophages strongly enriched in disease at 11.2 ± 6.6% versus 1.8 ± 1.0% in controls, and a mean fibroblast–macrophage transmission-electron-microscopy separation of 17.5 ± 12.7 µm [41].

The critical negative finding is that alpha-smooth-muscle-actin-positive, COL1A1-positive myofibroblasts were not significantly upregulated in gluteal muscle contracture [41]. Fascial fibrosis, at least in that disease, need not be myofibroblast-driven. A convergent observation across both datasets is the appearance of an SPP1-expressing macrophage population in acute compartment syndrome and in gluteal contracture alike [39,41], suggesting a shared myeloid axis of fascial fibrosis that has not, to our knowledge, been previously assembled as a single claim. The same theme recurs in the frozen-shoulder capsular atlas, where MERTK-low CD48-positive macrophages are separated from MERTK-positive LYVE1-positive MRC1-positive resolving macrophages, alongside DKK3-positive and POSTN-positive fibroblast states [42].

No healthy-donor single-cell atlas of human muscular fascia has been published. This is the single most consequential gap in the biology of the field, because every cellular claim about “normal” fascia is currently inferred from diseased or adjacent tissue.

Fascia as a progenitor and stem-cell compartment

This is the section that justifies reading fascia as a regenerative organ rather than as packing.

The fascia progenitor of wound repair. Deep scars are not built cell-by-cell at the wound site; pre-assembled fascial matrix is dragged upward into the wound, a mechanism demonstrated in 2019 and subsequently dissected molecularly [6]. The migratory machinery involves N-cadherin-dependent swarming [43], connexin-43 [44] and p120 catenin [45]. The cell responsible is a CD201-positive multipotent fibroblast progenitor resident in fascia, which generates pro-inflammatory fibroblasts and myofibroblasts in a spatiotemporally tuned sequence, with retinoic-acid and hypoxia signalling acting as entry checkpoints into the pro-inflammatory and myofibroblast states respectively [5,16]. A parallel lineage framework distinguishes Engrailed-1-positive, CD26-positive fibroblasts as the fibrogenic lineage [46], with mechanical tension activating Engrailed-1 through YAP and verteporfin reversing it [47], and Engrailed-1 small-interfering-RNA nanoparticles subsequently tested as an antifibrotic strategy [48]. A 2026 wave of pharmacological screens has begun to target this programme directly with repurposed agents including fluvastatin, thiostrepton and fenbendazole [49], tariquidar, terfenadine and zinc pyrithione [50], and FOSL1/MMP3 blockade with SR11302 [51]. A significant negative result deserves equal billing: adipocytes do not convert to myofibroblasts in this system [52].

Fibro-adipogenic progenitors. The muscle-associated fascial compartment hosts PDGFRα-positive, Sca1-positive fibro-adipogenic progenitors that are required for efficient satellite-cell-mediated regeneration but that produce fibro-fatty degeneration when dysregulated [7,53]. Subsequent work resolved Tie2 and Vcam1 subsets [54], identified Hic1 as a quiescence determinant [55], and established that muscle connective-tissue fibroblasts and fibro-adipogenic progenitors are the same population [56]. Macrophage-derived tumour necrosis factor drives their apoptosis whereas transforming growth factor beta-1 sustains them, with nilotinib shifting the balance [58-60]. Recent additions include RUNX2 and the CADD522 axis [61], chimeric-antigen-receptor T-cell targeting of fibro-adipogenic progenitors [62], and lysophosphatidic-acid-driven YAP/TAZ activation after denervation [63].

The fascial matrix as a satellite-cell niche. Collagen VI is required for satellite-cell self-renewal [64], substrate elasticity near 12 kPa preserves stemness [65], laminin remodelling licenses expansion [66], collagen V signalling through the calcitonin receptor maintains quiescence [67], fibronectin loss impairs aged satellite cells [69], and fibro-adipogenic-progenitor-derived WISP1 declines with age [70]. The niche, in other words, is fascial matrix.

Fascia-derived cells as a therapeutic source. Fascia-derived cells display chondrogenic capacity [71]; superficial-fascia adipose tissue yields a higher CD105-positive fraction than deep adipose tissue [72]; fascia-derived stem cells outperform adipose-derived stem cells in an HMOX1–HIF-1α-dependent manner [73]; and fascial adipocytes are functionally distinct from subcutaneous adipocytes [74]. A systematic review screened 648 records and included 34 studies — 17 in vitro, 17 animal and 4 clinical — reporting matrix remodelling as a central outcome in 81% of in vitro studies, immunomodulatory or antifibrotic effects in 56%, and functional improvement or graft integration in 82% of clinical studies, which were typically smaller than 50 patients [75]. The honest reading is that the clinical strand is entirely uncontrolled: the regenerative promise of fascia is at present biologically substantiated and clinically untested.

Tissue engineering and grafts. Decellularised porcine musculofascial matrix has been characterised [76], and a key methodological finding is that gamma irradiation at or above 25 kGy, rather than decellularisation itself, damages crosslinks in human fascia lata, reducing mechanical properties by 29.4% [77]. Adipose-derived stem cells have been used to build fascia equivalents [78], laminated collagen with alginate-encapsulated mesenchymal stromal cells tested for hernia repair [79], endometrial mesenchymal stromal cells seeded on gelatin mesh [80], and amniotic-fluid stem-cell meshes reported [81]. Clinically, fascia lata allograft abdominal-wall reconstruction produced no recurrence in 21 patients [82]; acellular dermal matrix augmentation gave intact rotator cuffs in 85% versus 40% of controls [83]; autologous fascia lata augmentation gave a 7.1% five-year retear rate [84]; and 94.9% of 39 superior-capsular-reconstruction donors were satisfied [85].

Matrix chemistry: hyaluronan, viscosity and the densification construct

Hyaluronan content in human fascia tracks the sliding demand of the site. In 15 patients, retinacula of the ankle contained approximately 90 µg/g, fascia lata approximately 35 µg/g, rectus sheath approximately 29 µg/g and fascia overlying trapezius and deltoid only approximately 6 µg/g, with no significant differences by age or sex except in plantar fascia [86]. HAS1 and HAS2 generate high-molecular-weight chains of 2–4 × 10⁶ Da while HAS3 generates 0.4–2.5 × 10⁵ Da, and fascia reports chains of 10⁶–10⁷ Da [88]. Molecular weight determines receptor usage: high-molecular-weight hyaluronan signals mainly through CD44, low-molecular-weight through RHAMM, and 4–25 kDa fragments act as danger signals [89].

The rheology explains why small compositional shifts matter disproportionately: above the coil-overlap concentration, viscosity varies with the third to fourth power of concentration [91]. Above 40 °C the superstructure breaks down and viscosity falls, whereas the fall in muscle pH to approximately 6.60 after strenuous exercise is reported to raise viscosity by approximately 20% [88,92].

“Densification” denotes a reversible rheological alteration in which interlayer hyaluronan aggregates and becomes adhesive rather than lubricating, increasing gliding resistance without a change in collagen architecture; fibrosis denotes an actual change in matrix composition [92]. The evidence for densification is rheological, imaging-based and therapeutic rather than histological: no retrieved source provides direct histological confirmation in humans [88]. Hyaluronidase, the pharmacological corollary, has improved stiffness and range of motion in post-stroke arm stiffness with effects lasting over three months [88,90,94], but the clinical literature remains uncontrolled, including a three-patient Ledderhose series [95].

Innervation, nociception and the limits of the proprioceptive claim

A systematic review screening 5210 records and including 23 studies established the density comparison that anchors this field: thoracolumbar fascia contains 3.4 ± 0.6 nerve fibres per 40,000 µm² against 1.0 ± 0.1 in latissimus dorsi muscle, an approximately threefold difference, and masseter fascia 404.5 fibres/mm² against masseter muscle 227.6 fibres/mm² [3]. Free nerve-ending density is 9.01 ± 0.98% in thoracolumbar fascia versus 2.78 ± 0.6% in gluteal fascia, and approximately 40% of fascial innervation is sympathetic [2].

The proprioceptive claim requires qualification that is frequently omitted. In 20 human upper limbs sampled at five sites, deep fascia showed free nerve endings and encapsulated Ruffini and Pacini corpuscles, with the flexor retinaculum the most innervated element [96]. But corpuscular endings were not found in rat or human thoracolumbar fascia [38], and thoracolumbar fascia and fascia lata are reported to contain no Pacini or Ruffini corpuscles [2]. “Fascia is a proprioceptive organ” is therefore a site-specific statement, defensible for retinacula and not demonstrated for the thoracolumbar fascia around which most clinical theory is built. Piezo2 is the principal proprioceptive channel, present in all sampled muscle spindles and Golgi tendon organs, with 81% of parvalbumin-positive dorsal-root-ganglion neurons Piezo2-positive [97].

Nociceptive architecture is layer-specific: in rat and human thoracolumbar fascia the middle layer is largely free of free nerve endings, calcitonin-gene-related peptide is the commonest peptide, and approximately 45% of free nerve endings are low-threshold [38,98]. In human volunteers, 5.8% hypertonic saline injected into the posterior layer of thoracolumbar fascia produced significantly greater pain than injection into subcutis (p < 0.01) or muscle (p < 0.001) [4], replicated in a dose–response study in which peak pain was approximately 86% higher and pain area approximately 65% larger for fascia than muscle [99]. Nerve growth factor injected into erector spinae fascia caused no acute pain but produced mechanical sensitisation for a week and proton-evoked pain for two weeks without altering heat thresholds [100]. Centrally, muscle inflammation raised the proportion of fascia-responsive dorsal-horn neurons from 4% to 15%, a mechanism by which fascia becomes painful secondary to muscle pathology [101].

Force transmission and the myofascial chain literature

Huijing’s taxonomy distinguishes myotendinous, intramuscular, intermuscular and extramuscular myofascial force transmission, the last two grouped as epimuscular myofascial force transmission [103]. In humans, active stretch produced 22% greater plantarflexion force and smaller relative displacement between soleus and lateral gastrocnemius aponeuroses than passive stretch [105].

The chain literature is where the field’s marketing most exceeds its evidence, and the most rigorous appraisal — 62 studies from 6589 records — grades it transition by transition [106]. The superficial back line, back functional line and front functional line have all verified transitions and strong evidence; the spiral line verifies 5 of 9 and the lateral line 2 of 5; the superficial front line has zero verified transitions across 7 studies [106]. A companion review of intermuscular force transmission included 9 studies with sample sizes of 6–37 [107], and a scoping review of 20 studies covering 405 patients found the literature heterogeneous and of low methodological quality [108]. Anatomical continuity is well documented for some chains and absent for others; functional force transfers in vivo rests on low-quality evidence.

Mechanotransduction: the axis that unifies the field

Integrins are the primary force sensors, with single-integrin forces of 1–40 pN and a talin rod containing 11 force-exposed vinculin-binding sites [109]. Physiological strains are small — 5–6% in human wrist tendon, 4–5% in ligament — and loading activates immediate-early genes before late matrix genes [110]. Cyclic stretch upregulates Piezo1, which promotes fibroblast activation via YAP [111]. In lung fibroblasts, 45 of 86 stiffness-enhanced transcripts overlapped YAP targets, normal shear modulus was 0.59 kPa against 5.16 kPa in fibrosis, and YAP/TAZ knockdown reduced collagen production, proliferation and traction force — a stiffness-to-YAP/TAZ-to-fibrosis feed-forward loop [112]. Latent transforming growth factor beta-1 is activated mechanically rather than only transcriptionally: myofibroblast-derived matrix released 36% of its active cytokine on contraction versus 11% for fibroblast-derived matrix [113].

Three lines of evidence bring this axis into fascia itself. First, in human thoracolumbar fascia explants, extracorporeal shockwave exposure increased YAP and phosphorylated YAP (p = 0.0022) together with COL1A1 and HABP2 expression [114]. Second, angiotensin II activates YAP in fascial cells, and fascia expresses renin–angiotensin receptors at 300.2 ± 317 copies per 25 ng for AT1R, 147 ± 122 for AT2R and 37.1 ± 39.6 for MasR [115]. Third, low-dose dihydrotestosterone at 0.4 ng/mL increased collagen I from 2.09 ± 0.91% to 4.80 ± 1.75% and decreased collagen III from 10.46 ± 0.53% to 3.32 ± 0.46% in a non-monotonic fashion [117]. Fascia is therefore hormonally and mechanically tunable in vitro.

Langevin’s series supplies the manual-therapy mechanism. Needle rotation produces dose-dependent, non-monotonic fibroblast cytoskeletal remodelling [118]; approximately 80% of acupoints correspond to connective-tissue planes [119]; needle grasp is measurable [120]; and remodelling is blocked by blebbistatin and Rho-kinase inhibition [121]. Tissue stretch alone expands fibroblasts within minutes and is blocked by Y-27632, suramin, apyrase, octanol and carbenoxolone, implicating Rho-kinase-dependent remodelling driven by ATP released through gap-junction-like pathways [122]. Stretch is also anti-inflammatory: in rats it reduced inflammatory-lesion thickness and neutrophil counts and raised intralesional resolvin D1, an effect reproduced by resolvin injection [123].

Clinical phenotypes and the case-definition problem

Reported prevalence of myofascial pain syndrome ranges from 37% of men and 65% of women aged 30–60, to 85% above age 65, to 93% in specialist pain clinics [87,124]. That dispersion is not sampling noise; it reflects the absence of a validated case definition. The measurement that constrains everything downstream is the interrater reliability of trigger-point palpation, pooled at kappa 0.452 (95% CI 0.364–0.540) across 6 studies and 363 patients [125]. A trenchant critique holds that the trigger-point construct is not scientifically sustainable [126], answered by an equally direct rebuttal [127]; this review presents the dispute as unresolved rather than adjudicating it.

Objective correlates exist but do not rescue the diagnosis. Microdialysis at active trigger points found elevated bradykinin, substance P, calcitonin-gene-related peptide, tumour necrosis factor alpha and interleukins 1β, 6 and 8 with lowered pH — and, critically, the same milieu at a remote uninvolved gastrocnemius site, implying a central component [128]. Ultrasonographically, active trigger points measure 0.57 ± 0.20 cm² versus latent 0.36 ± 0.16 and normal 0.17 ± 0.22 cm², area under the curve 0.9, although pressure-pain threshold did not correlate with area [130]. A systematic review of 33 imaging studies found no computed-tomography, positron-emission or single-photon studies at all [132].

Low back pain. Point prevalence is 18.3% and cases are projected to reach 843 million by 2050 [133]. Perimuscular connective tissue is approximately 25% thicker and more echogenic in chronic low back pain, correlating with body mass index at r = 0.66 [134], and thoracolumbar fascia measures 2.11 ± 0.65 mm versus 1.75 ± 0.85 mm in controls [135]. Shear strain, however, does not replicate: it was lower in low back pain in a 121-subject study (56.4 ± 3.1% versus 70.2 ± 3.6%, p < 0.01) [136] but higher in a 60-subject study (327.1 ± 106.0 versus 290.2 ± 99.8, p < 0.0001) [137]. A 2026 meta-analysis resolves the pattern in favour of thickness: standardised mean difference 0.64 (0.41–0.88) across 14 studies and 1001 participants for thickness, with stiffness at 0.82 [133]. Thickening replicates; shear strain does not.

Plantar fasciopathy. Incidence is 3.83 per 1000 person-years with a peak at 40–60 years [138]. The defining histology is myxoid degeneration without inflammation in 50 specimens — hence “fasciosis” rather than “fasciitis” [140]. The only pooled risk factor across 51 studies and 104 candidate variables is body mass index above 27 kg/m², odds ratio 3.7 (2.93–5.62) [141]. Fascia is 2.16 mm thicker (1.60–2.71) across 23 studies [142], a 4 mm cutoff gives an area under the curve of 0.950 [143], and combining thickness of 4.05 ± 0.74 mm with a Young’s modulus of 55.92 ± 11.13 kPa against 100.29 ± 58.44 kPa in controls raises the area under the curve to 0.973 [144]. Elastography meta-analysis gives a standardised mean difference of −3.00 m/s [145]. Natural history is worse than commonly stated: 44.0% of 174 patients remained symptomatic at 15 years [146].

Dupuytren disease. Prevalence rises from 12% at age 55 to 21% at 65 and 29% at 75 [147], with a global pooled estimate of 8.2% and 34.1% in type 1 diabetes [148]. Heritability is approximately 80% with a sibling recurrence risk ratio of 4.48 [149], and genome-wide association identified 9 loci of which 6 are Wnt-related, SFRP4 reaching odds ratio 1.98 at p = 5.6 × 10⁻³⁹ [150]. The stem-cell strand must be read with care: viable findings include CD13/CD29-positive nodular cells [151], a CD34-negative CD73/CD90/CD105-positive perinodular fat population [152] and OCT4/NANOG/STAT3/SALL4 expression in CD34-positive microvessels [153], but one prominent paper in this series is retracted and another carries an expression of concern, and neither is cited here.

Other fascial diseases. Necrotising fasciitis incidence rose from 9 to 21 per million between 2002 and 2017 with 16% mortality [154]. Fasciotomy for chronic exertional compartment syndrome succeeds in only 48% at 12 months [156]. Adhesion burden remains substantial, with 3.5% directly adhesion-related readmission at five years across 72,270 patients and a hazard ratio of 0.68 favouring laparoscopy [157]; chronic post-hernia pain affects 17.01% [158] and post-caesarean pain 15.4% [159]. Fascia also behaves as a systemic target organ: in 344 adolescents with diabetes, plantar fascia thickening predicted retinopathy (odds ratio 2.4) and autonomic neuropathy (odds ratio 4.94) [160], and in systemic sclerosis magnetic resonance imaging showed fasciitis, synovitis or subcutaneous thickening in 16 of 18 patients [161]. Delayed-onset muscle soreness appears disproportionately fascial in origin [162], although pressure-pain threshold did not change significantly in a controlled study [163].

Diagnostic reliability, which determines what any trial can measure

Intra-rater intraclass correlation for deep-fascia thickness across 10 anatomical sites ranged 0.677–0.975 and inter-rater 0.473–0.966 [164]. Thoracolumbar fascia shear-wave elastography achieves intra-rater intraclass correlation of 0.86–0.94 and inter-rater 0.90–0.94 with a minimal detectable change below 4.71 kPa [165], but a dedicated multi-site reliability study reported intra-day intraclass correlations as low as 0.33 and inter-day as low as 0.54, with skin and fascia measured more reliably than muscle [166]. In plantar fasciitis, elastographic reliability was only fair to moderate at 0.42–0.64 [167]. Absolute kilopascal values are therefore not transferable between devices or laboratories, and elastography should not serve as a primary endpoint.

Interpretation also requires the right yardstick. For low back pain, the minimal important change is approximately 15 mm on a visual analogue scale and 10 points on the Oswestry Disability Index [168]. For plantar heel pain it is considerably smaller, −8.5 mm for average pain and −19.2 mm for first-step pain [170], so effect sizes cannot be transported between the two conditions.

Umbrella synthesis of fascia-directed interventions

Manual and instrument-assisted therapies: Myofascial release improves disability in chronic low back pain with a standardised mean difference of −0.35 (−0.68, −0.02) but does not significantly improve pain at −0.12 [172], and an independent synthesis found effects below the minimal clinically important difference [174]. Massage does not change myotendinous stiffness, standardised mean difference −0.17 [175]. The most informative recent study is a quantitative-ultrasound randomised trial in which chiropractic manipulation and massage both reduced thoracolumbar fascia shear strain (β = −16%, p = 0.021 and β = −32%, p < 0.001) against a 19% increase in controls — yet the change did not correlate with disability (ρ = 0.261, p = 0.054) [176]. Mechanism moved; outcome did not follow.

Instrument-assisted soft-tissue mobilisation beats sham but has never beaten conventional physiotherapy, and the two meta-analyses disagree on certainty: pain standardised mean difference 0.60 at moderate certainty in one [177] against very low certainty in the other, function non-significant at −0.28 [10]. Foam rolling improves range of motion (effect size 0.823) without improving performance or altering stiffness [178-180]; percussive devices impaired 20-metre sprint performance (d = 0.34) [181]. Static stretching reduces deep fascia stiffness (d = 0.42) whereas dynamic stretching does not [182]. High-load strength training gave a 29-point Foot Function Index advantage at 3 months that had disappeared by 12 months [183].

Needling and hydrodissection: Dry needling produces a large short-term effect, standardised mean difference −1.91, but shows no advantage over physical modalities and all eight contributing randomised trials carried high risk of bias [184]; an umbrella review of 36 systematic reviews covering 24,869 participants reached similarly guarded conclusions [9]. Adverse events are common but minor, from 0 to 48.15%, with major events from 0 to 0.43% [185]. Hydrodissection with 5% dextrose shows a volume dependency — 4 mL outperformed 1–2 mL to 12 weeks but the difference vanished by 24 weeks [186] — and dextrose outperformed saline (mean difference −1.30) and corticosteroid (−0.81) [187], ranking best on SUCRA in a network meta-analysis [188]. Fascial plane blocks provide independent anatomical proof that injectate spreads along fascial planes [189].

Energy-based modalities: Extracorporeal shockwave therapy outperforms placebo, with a pooled standardised mean difference of −0.60 across 22 trials and 2299 participants, but at low to very low certainty and with no intensity setting beating placebo for function [191]. Focal shockwave gave a pooled effect of −2.818 elsewhere [192], radial shockwave was not superior to other electrophysical modalities [193], and in a 236-study network covering 15,401 patients shockwave was the only modality effective at both medium and long term (long-term mean difference −2.49) [194]. Photobiomodulation reduced pain by −22.02 alone and outperformed shockwave by −20.94 [12,195]. Therapeutic ultrasound is negative [197], and cupping rests on very low certainty with 4 of 5 trials at high risk of bias [11,198].

Injectables: The Cochrane review of corticosteroid injection for plantar heel pain covered 39 studies and 2492 participants and found a mean difference of −6.38 (−11.13, −1.64) against a minimal important difference of 8, with no medium-term effect [199]; among reported rupture cases, 130 of 155 had received prior steroid [200]. Botulinum toxin ranks well for short-term pain in networks [201] but a recent meta-analysis concluded it is explicitly not recommendable for neck and shoulder myofascial pain, with a mean difference of −10.22 on a 0–100 scale [203]. Prolotherapy acts slowly and durably (weighted mean difference −41.72 against saline, low certainty) [204]. Foot orthoses give a standardised mean difference of −0.27 [205], and low-dye taping estimates diverge markedly, −1.24 [206] against −3.60 [194], a discrepancy we flag rather than average.

Orthobiologics: Platelet-rich plasma is superior to corticosteroid between 3 and 12 months, but 9 of 15 contributing trials carried high risk of bias [207], and a meta-analysis of 24 randomised trials with 1653 participants found better pain scores at 3–6 months with no difference in fascial thickness [208]. Subfascial platelet-rich plasma in greater trochanteric pain syndrome outperformed control on the Hip Outcome Score sports subscale, 32.09 versus 20.52, p = 0.048 [209]. Amniotic and placental products supply the strongest single dataset: after a Level I pilot [210], a 145-patient, 14-site randomised trial of micronised dehydrated human amnion–chorion membrane reported a 76% versus 45% reduction in visual analogue scale pain (p < 0.0001) and a 60% versus 40% improvement in the revised Foot Function Index (p = 0.0004) [211], although an earlier pilot was largely null [212]. Hyaluronic acid gave −3.3 ± 0.3 cm versus −2.4 ± 0.3 (p = 0.029) in 168 patients [213]. Bone-marrow aspirate concentrate evidence is a 19-patient uncontrolled series [214] and adipose-derived evidence a 14-patient crossover [215]. The amnion–chorion trial is, on the evidence retrieved, the only adequately powered placebo-controlled randomised trial of an orthobiologic in a fascial disease.

Surgical and procedural. For Dupuytren contracture, a GRADE assessment rated high to moderate concluded that percutaneous needle fasciotomy, collagenase and limited fasciectomy are equally effective long term, with limited fasciectomy showing the lowest recurrence and the evidence favouring needle fasciotomy over collagenase [216]. The 672-patient DISC trial across 31 hospitals found differences of 5.95 (3.12–8.77) at one year and 7.18 (4.18–10.88) at two years, providing little evidence to reject the inferiority of collagenase, which was cheaper by £1090 but delivered 0.048 fewer quality-adjusted life years [217]. Regulatory status must be read separately from efficacy: collagenase remains approved in the United States at 0.58 mg per cord with a tendon-rupture rate of 3 in 1082 [218], while the European authorisation was withdrawn effective 1 March 2020 and the Canadian authorisation cancelled on 15 June 2020, both for commercial rather than safety reasons [219]. Focused shockwave devices hold premarket approvals P000048 and P040026, the former withdrawn in 2018 without stated reason [221], and percutaneous tenotomy is cleared under K181367 [223]. Endoscopic and open plantar fasciotomy produce no outcome difference, but endoscopic surgery is shorter (15.76 versus 36.78 minutes) with fewer complications (5% versus 11%) [224], and fascia-preserving gastrocnemius recession gives a standardised mean difference of 0.81 [225].

Methodological quality of the review base

The most important single number in the therapeutic literature is not an effect size. Across 96 systematic reviews of myofascial interventions, AMSTAR-2 confidence was critically low in 75% and high in only 4.2% [14]. This is the context in which every pooled estimate above should be read: the field is review-rich and certainty-poor. Four further records that are commonly cited as review-level evidence are, on inspection, a Cochrane protocol without results [226] or reviews without a reproducible systematic search [227-229], and we flag them as non-systematic rather than counting them.

Cell type

Defining markers or morphology

Reported quantity

Source

Fasciacyte

HAS2+, S100A4+, vimentin+, CD68−; Alcian blue and HABP positive

~30% of fibroblast-like cells of deep fascia

[2,28]

Telocyte

Cell body 9.39 ± 3.26 µm, telopodes up to ~22 µm; CD34+

0–2 per field of view in fascia lata

[29]

Mast cell

Metachromatic granules; perineural clustering

20.4 ± 9.4/mm² in superficial fascia; ~25% near nerves

[34]

Myofibroblast

α-SMA+

Median 1.52% lumbar fascia; 0% plantar fascia and fascia lata

[35]

CD201+ fascia progenitor

CD201+, multipotent

Not quantified as a tissue fraction

[5,16]

Fibro-adipogenic progenitor

PDGFRα+, Sca1+; Hic1, Tie2/Vcam1 subsets

Not quantified in human fascia

[7,55]

Macrophage (disease)

CD68/myeloid clusters; SPP1+ subset

11.2 ± 6.6% in gluteal contracture vs 1.8 ± 1.0% control

[39,41]

Table 1: Fascial cell populations and their quantitative characterisation.

Parameter

Value

Source

Deep fascia overall thickness

~1 mm, 2–3 collagen sublayers

[1]

Crural fascia total thickness

924 µm; sublayers 277.6 µm; interlayer 43 µm

[22]

Fascia lata thickness

926 ± 156 µm

[2]

Thoracolumbar fascia, chronic LBP vs control

2.11 ± 0.65 vs 1.75 ± 0.85 mm

[135]

Plantar fascia, fasciitis vs control

6.07 ± 2.37 vs 3.28 ± 0.41 mm; 4 mm cutoff AUC 0.97

[167]

Elastic fibre content

~15% epimysial vs <1% aponeurotic fascia

[2]

Hyaluronan, ankle retinacula

~90 µg/g

[86]

Hyaluronan, fascia lata / rectus sheath

~35 / ~29 µg/g

[86]

Hyaluronan, trapezius and deltoid fascia

~6 µg/g

[86]

Nerve fibre density, TLF vs latissimus dorsi

3.4 ± 0.6 vs 1.0 ± 0.1 per 40,000 µm²

[3]

Sympathetic share of fascial innervation

~40%

[2,38]

Aging: lower-limb vs low-back fascial thickness

−12.3 to −25.8% vs +40.0 to +76.7%

[25]

Table 2: Quantitative morphology and matrix chemistry of human fascia.

Intervention

Best available pooled estimate

Reported certainty

Source

Myofascial release, chronic LBP

Disability SMD −0.35 (−0.68, −0.02); pain NS

Moderate (GRADE)

[172]

Massage, myotendinous stiffness

SMD −0.17 (NS)

Not stated

[175]

Instrument-assisted mobilisation

Pain SMD 0.60; function SMD −0.28 (NS)

Moderate vs very low (conflicting)

[10,177]

Foam rolling

ROM ES 0.823; no performance or stiffness change

Not stated

[178,180]

Dry needling

Short-term SMD −1.91; no advantage over modalities

High risk of bias in all 8 RCTs

[9,184]

5% dextrose hydrodissection

Superior to saline MD −1.30; best SUCRA rank

Low

[187]

Extracorporeal shockwave

SMD −0.60; only modality effective medium and long term (MD −2.49)

Low to very low

[191,194]

Photobiomodulation

MD −22.02 vs control; −20.94 vs shockwave

Not stated

[195]

Therapeutic ultrasound

No benefit

Low

[197]

Corticosteroid injection, plantar heel

MD −6.38 (−11.13, −1.64) against MID of 8

Low

[199]

Botulinum toxin, neck/shoulder

MD −10.22 (0–100); not recommendable

Low

[203]

Prolotherapy

WMD −41.72 vs saline

Low

[204]

Platelet-rich plasma

Superior to corticosteroid 3–12 months; no thickness change

9/15 RCTs high risk of bias

[207]

Amnion–chorion membrane

VAS −76% vs −45% (p < 0.0001); FFI-R −60% vs −40%

Adequately powered multicentre RCT

[211]

Cupping

Uncertain benefit

Very low; 4/5 RCTs high risk of bias

[198]

Dupuytren: PNF vs collagenase vs fasciectomy

Equally effective long term; LF lowest recurrence

High to moderate (GRADE)

[216]

Table 3: Review-level evidence for fascia-directed interventions, with reported certainty.

Discussion

A single mechanism, many diseases

The most defensible synthesis this literature supports is that fascial disorders are the pathological settings of one conserved mechanochemical axis. Stretch and stiffness are read by integrins and Piezo1, transduced through Rho-kinase and YAP/TAZ, and executed by transforming growth factor beta-1 that is liberated mechanically from the matrix it is stored in [109,111-113]. Fascia participates in this axis directly rather than by analogy, since shockwave, angiotensin II and androgen all modulate YAP or collagen composition in human fascial tissue and cells [114,117]. Around that core, the hyaluronan layer supplies a fast, reversible, rheological control loop with third-to-fourth-power sensitivity to concentration, and the fasciacyte is its dedicated effector cell [28,91].

That framing accounts for why immobility converts a reversible hyaluronan state into irreversible collagenous thickening [88], why stretch is anti-inflammatory through resolvin D1 rather than mechanical rearrangement alone [123], why needling produces dose-dependent, non-monotonic cytoskeletal responses [118], and why aging moves fascia in opposite directions in different regions according to local loading history [25].

Why the biology has not yet reached patients

The gap between this biology and clinical practice is not a translational lag; it is a series of specific, nameable absences. There is no first-in-human trial of any fascia-derived cellular product and no trial of mesenchymal stromal cells or stromal vascular fraction injected into any fascia. There is no fascia-specific extracellular-vesicle study, no bioprinted fascial construct, and no in vitro study of platelet-rich plasma applied to fascial fibroblasts, despite platelet-rich plasma being among the most frequently injected agents into fascial tissue [75,207]. There is no biglycan- and fibromodulin-defined progenitor niche described for fascia comparable to the one established for tendon [230], and no progenitor-level study of plantar fibromatosis.

Three further absences constrain interpretation of everything that does exist. First, no healthy human deep-fascia single-cell atlas has been published; both existing datasets are surgical disease [40]. Second, the identity relationship between telocytes and fibro-adipogenic progenitors is unresolved [31]. Third, matrix metalloproteinase, tissue inhibitor and lysyl oxidase quantification in human deep fascia is simply missing, so the crosslinking narrative in fascia is imported wholesale from tendon, lung and tumour stroma [231].

The measurement problem is upstream of the treatment problem

The therapeutic tables above should be read not as a modality ranking but as a statement about measurement. When the index diagnosis is applied with an interrater kappa of 0.452 [125], when elastographic values are not transferable between devices [165], when the most-cited mechanical marker of fascial dysfunction points in opposite directions in two well-conducted studies [136], and when three quarters of relevant systematic reviews are of critically low AMSTAR-2 confidence [14], the ceiling on demonstrable treatment effect is set before any intervention is chosen.

The quantitative-ultrasound trial that dissociated mechanical change from clinical change makes this concrete: manual therapy demonstrably altered thoracolumbar fascia shear strain, and that alteration did not track disability [176]. Similarly, platelet-rich plasma improved pain without altering fascial thickness [208]. Mechanistic surrogates in fascia are, so far, not validated as outcome surrogates, and should not be used as primary endpoints until they are.

What is genuinely established

Five claims survive scrutiny: fascia contains a dedicated hyaluronan-producing cell type with a defined marker profile [28]; it is more densely innervated than the muscle it invests and more painful under experimental chemical stimulation [3]; it contains a multipotent progenitor that supplies both cells and pre-assembled matrix to scar [5]; fascial thickening is a replicable imaging finding in chronic low back pain and plantar fasciopathy [133,142]; and fascial fibrosis, in the two human diseases sequenced so far, is macrophage-associated rather than myofibroblast-dominated [41].

Five widely repeated claims do not survive. Fascia is not uniformly proprioceptive, since corpuscular receptors are absent from thoracolumbar fascia and fascia lata [2,38]; the superficial front line has no verified anatomical transitions [106]; densification has no direct human histological confirmation [88]; reduced fascial shear strain in low back pain does not replicate [137]; and fascia is not generally contractile, myofibroblasts being absent from plantar fascia and fascia lata [35].

A research agenda

Four priorities follow. First, a healthy-donor single-cell and spatial atlas of human muscular fascia, without which no disease dataset can be properly normalised. Second, a validated case definition for myofascial pain with interrater reliability meaningfully above 0.45, since no trial programme can outperform its own diagnostic ceiling. Third, a phase I trial of an autologous fascia-derived cellular product, which the in vitro and animal evidence now amply justifies [73,75]. Fourth, head-to-head comparison of the two interventions with the most credible existing data — extracorporeal shockwave, the only modality effective at medium and long term in the largest network [194], and amnion–chorion membrane, the only orthobiologic with an adequately powered placebo-controlled trial [211] — using endpoints anchored to condition-specific minimal important differences [170].

Limitations

Four limitations should be weighed. The design is hybrid, and the narrative strand covering cell and progenitor biology was not conducted as a systematic review, because that literature presently has too few comparable studies to pool. The umbrella strand inherits the quality of its constituent reviews, which is predominantly critically low by their own AMSTAR-2 assessment [14]. Definitional heterogeneity across three coexisting nomenclatures means some pooling in the source reviews may combine non-equivalent tissues. Finally, the searches were not registered in advance, so this work should be read as a comprehensive critical synthesis rather than a protocol-registered systematic review.

Conclusion

Muscular fascia is best understood not as packing tissue and not as a mystical continuum, but as a mechanically gated progenitor and immune compartment with its own resident cell types, a site-specific matrix chemistry tuned to local sliding demand, an innervation denser than that of the muscle it invests, and a conserved mechanotransduction axis that its diseases dysregulate. The biological case for fascia as a regenerative target is now strong, resting on a defined fascial progenitor, an indispensable fibro-adipogenic progenitor population, and fascia-derived cells that outperform adipose-derived cells in comparative assays. The clinical case is far weaker, and for identifiable reasons: no fascia-derived cellular product has entered a human trial, no healthy human fascial single-cell reference exists, the dominant clinical diagnosis has poor interrater reliability, mechanical surrogates have not been validated as outcome surrogates, and three quarters of the relevant systematic reviews are of critically low confidence. The field’s next decade will be decided less by new modalities than by whether it can define its diagnoses reproducibly and test its most promising biology in patients.

Acknowledgements

The author thanks the researchers whose primary datasets made this synthesis possible.

Conflict of interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

Funding

This work received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

Ethics statement

This study is a review of previously published literature and involved no human participants, identifiable human data or animal experimentation. It therefore did not require approval by a research ethics committee or institutional review board.

Use of artificial intelligence

Artificial-intelligence tools were used to assist with literature retrieval, reference formatting and language editing. All scientific content, interpretation and verification of quantitative values against source records are the responsibility of the author.

Data availability

All data discussed in this review are contained within the cited published sources.

References

  1. Stecco C, Porzionato A, Lancerotto L, Stecco A, Macchi V, Day JA, De Caro R. Histological study of the deep fasciae of the limbs. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2008;12(3):225–230.
  2. Fede C, Pirri C, Fan C, Petrelli L, Guidolin D, De Caro R, Stecco C. A Closer Look at the Cellular and Molecular Components of the Deep/Muscular Fasciae. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(3):1411.
  3. Suarez-Rodriguez V, Fede C, Pirri C, Petrelli L, Loro-Ferrer JF, Rodriguez-Ruiz D, De Caro R, Stecco C. Fascial Innervation: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(10):5674.
  4. Schilder A, Hoheisel U, Magerl W, Benrath J, Klein T, Treede RD. Sensory findings after stimulation of the thoracolumbar fascia with hypertonic saline suggest its contribution to low back pain. Pain. 2014;155(2):222–231.
  5. Correa-Gallegos D, Ye H, Dasgupta B, Sardogan A, Kadri S, Kandi R, Dai R, Lin Y, Kopplin R, Shenai DS, Wannemacher J, Ichijo R, Jiang D, Strunz M, Ansari M, Angelidis I, Schiller HB, Volz T, Machens HG, Rinkevich Y. CD201+ fascia progenitors choreograph injury repair. Nature. 2023;623(7988):792–802.
  6. Correa-Gallegos D, Jiang D, Christ S, Ramesh P, Ye H, Wannemacher J, et al. Patch repair of deep wounds by mobilized fascia. Nature. 2019;576(7786):287-292.
  7. Joe AW, Yi L, Natarajan A, Le Grand F, So L, Wang J, et al. Muscle injury activates resident fibro/adipogenic progenitors that facilitate myogenesis. Nat Cell Biol. 2010;12(2):153-63.
  8. Uezumi A, Fukada S, Yamamoto N, Takeda S, Tsuchida K. Mesenchymal progenitors distinct from satellite cells contribute to ectopic fat cell formation in skeletal muscle. Nat Cell Biol. 2010;12(2):143-52.
  9. Chys M, De Meulemeester K, De Greef I, Murillo C, Kindt W, Kouzouz Y, Lescroart B, Cagnie B. Clinical effectiveness of dry needling in patients with musculoskeletal pain—an umbrella review. J Clin Med. 2023;12(3):1205.
  10. Nazari G, Bobos P, Lu SZ, Reischl S, Sharma S, Le CY, Vader K, Held N, MacDermid JC. Effectiveness of instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization for the management of upper body, lower body, and spinal conditions. An updated systematic review with meta-analyses. Disabil Rehabil. 2023;45(10):1608-1618.
  11. Elmeligie MM, Yehia AH, Hamada Mohamed M, Mahmoud M, Alkholui MN, Mohamed GI. Effectiveness of cupping therapy for musculoskeletal pain: an umbrella review. Human Movement. 2024;25(4):109.
  12. Son Y, Lee H, Yu S, et al. Effects of photobiomodulation on multiple health outcomes: an umbrella review of randomized clinical trials. Syst Rev. 2025;14:160.
  13. Guimarães JS, Arcanjo FL, Leporace G, Metsavaht LF, Sena C, Moreno MVMG, Vieira TEM, Gomes Neto M. Effect of low-level laser therapy on pain and disability in patients with plantar fasciitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2022;57:102478.
  14. Rhim HC, Kwon J, Park J, Borg-Stein J, Tenforde AS. A Systematic Review of Systematic Reviews on the Epidemiology, Evaluation, and Treatment of Plantar Fasciitis. Life (Basel). 2021;11(12):1287.
  15. Cox TR, Bird D, Baker AM, Barker HE, Ho MWY, Lang G, Erler JT. LOX-mediated collagen crosslinking is responsible for fibrosis-enhanced metastasis. Cancer Res. 2013;73(6):1721–1732.
  16. Correa-Gallegos D, Ye H, Dasgupta B, Sardogan A, Kadri S, Kandi R, et al. Author Correction: CD201(+) fascia progenitors choreograph injury repair. Nature. 2024;625(7993):E4.
  17. Benias PC, Wells RG, Sackey-Aboagye B, Klavan H, Reidy J, Buonocore D, et al. Structure and Distribution of an Unrecognized Interstitium in Human Tissues. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):4947.
  18. Benias PC, Wells RG, Sackey-Aboagye B, Klavan H, Reidy J, Buonocore D, et al. Author Correction: Structure and Distribution of an Unrecognized Interstitium in Human Tissues. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):7610.
  19. Schleip R, Hedley G, Yucesoy CA. Fascial nomenclature: Update on related consensus process. Clin Anat. 2019;32(7):929–933.
  20. Adstrum S, Hedley G, Schleip R, Stecco C, Yucesoy CA. Defining the fascial system. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2016;21(1):173–177.
  21. Stecco C, Pratt R, Nemetz LD, Schleip R, Stecco A, Theise ND. Towards a comprehensive definition of the human fascial system. J Anat. 2025;246(6):1084–1098.
  22. Stecco C, Pavan PG, Porzionato A, Macchi V, Lancerotto L, Carniel EL, Natali AN, De Caro R. Mechanics of crural fascia: from anatomy to constitutive modelling. Surg Radiol Anat. 2009;31(7):523–529.
  23. Fede C, Clair C, Pirri C, Petrelli L, Zhao X, Sun Y, Macchi V, Stecco C. The Human Superficial Fascia: A Narrative Review. Int J Mol Sci. 2025;26(3):1289.
  24. Pirri C, Pirri N, Macchi V, Porzionato A, De Caro R, Stecco C. Ultrasound Imaging of Thoracolumbar Fascia: A Systematic Review. Medicina (Kaunas). 2024;60(7):1090.
  25. Zullo A, Fleckenstein J, Schleip R, Hoppe K, Wearing S, Klingler W. Structural and Functional Changes in the Coupling of Fascial Tissue, Skeletal Muscle, and Nerves During Aging. Front Physiol. 2020;11:592.
  26. Fan C, Pirri C, Fede C, Guidolin D, Biz C, Petrelli L, Porzionato A, Macchi V, De Caro R, Stecco C. Age-Related Alterations of Hyaluronan and Collagen in Extracellular Matrix of the Muscle Spindles. J Clin Med. 2021;11(1):86.
  27. Stecco C, Stern R, Porzionato A, Macchi V, Masiero S, Stecco A, De Caro R. Hyaluronan within fascia in the etiology of myofascial pain. Surg Radiol Anat. 2011;33(10):891–896.
  28. Stecco C, Fede C, Macchi V, Porzionato A, Petrelli L, Biz C, Stern R, De Caro R. The fasciacytes: A new cell devoted to fascial gliding regulation. Clin Anat. 2018;31(5):667–676.
  29. Dawidowicz J, Szotek S, Matysiak N, Mielańczyk Ł, Maksymowicz K. Electron microscopy of human fascia lata: focus on telocytes. J Cell Mol Med. 2015;19(10):2500–2506.
  30. Díaz-Flores L, Gutiérrez R, García MP, Sáez FJ, Díaz-Flores L Jr, Valladares F, Madrid JF. CD34+ stromal cells/fibroblasts/fibrocytes/telocytes as a tissue reserve and a principal source of mesenchymal cells. Location, morphology, function and role in pathology. Histol Histopathol. 2014;29(7):831–870.
  31. Manetti M, Tani A, Rosa I, Chellini F, Squecco R, Idrizaj E, et al. Morphological evidence for telocytes as stromal cells supporting satellite cell activation in eccentric contraction-induced skeletal muscle injury. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):14515.
  32. Hejbøl EK, Hajjaj MA, Nielsen O, Schrøder HD. Marker Expression of Interstitial Cells in Human Skeletal Muscle: An Immunohistochemical Study. J Histochem Cytochem. 2019;67(11):825-844.
  33. Marini M, Rosa I, Ibba-Manneschi L, Manetti M. Telocytes in skeletal, cardiac and smooth muscle interstitium: morphological and functional aspects. Histol Histopathol. 2018;33(11):1151-1165.
  34. Fede C, Petrelli L, Pirri C, Tiengo C, De Caro R, Stecco C. Detection of Mast Cells in Human Superficial Fascia. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(14):11599.
  35. Schleip R, Gabbiani G, Wilke J, Naylor I, Hinz B, Zorn A, Jäger H, Breul R, Schreiner S, Klingler W. Fascia Is Able to Actively Contract and May Thereby Influence Musculoskeletal Dynamics: A Histochemical and Mechanographic Investigation. Front Physiol. 2019;10:336.
  36. Schleip R, Klingler W, Lehmann-Horn F. Active fascial contractility: Fascia may be able to contract in a smooth muscle-like manner and thereby influence musculoskeletal dynamics. Med Hypotheses. 2005;65(2):273–277.
  37. Schleip R, Klingler W. Active contractile properties of fascia. Clin Anat. 2019;32(7):891–895.
  38. Mense S. Innervation of the thoracolumbar fascia. Eur J Transl Myol. 2019;29(3):8297.
  39. Zheng L, Li G, Cao J, Zhao Z, Wang H, Dong Q, et al. SPP1+macrophages promote fibroblast-to-myofibroblast transformation during hypoxia in deep fascia of acute compartment syndrome. Front Immunol. 2025;16:1588926.
  40. Wang T, Long Y, Ma L, Dong Q, Li Y, Guo J, Jin L, Di L, Zhang Y, Wang L, Hou Z. Single-cell RNA-seq reveals cellular heterogeneity from deep fascia in patients with acute compartment syndrome. Front Immunol. 2023;13:1062479.
  41. Zhao W, Li Z, Ma S, Chen W, Wan Z, Zhu L, Li L, Wang D. Identification of pro-fibrotic cellular subpopulations in fascia of gluteal muscle contracture using single-cell RNA sequencing. J Transl Med. 2025;23:192.
  42. Ng MTH, Borst R, Gacaferi H, Davidson S, Ackerman JE, Johnson PA, et al. A single cell atlas of frozen shoulder capsule identifies features associated with inflammatory fibrosis resolution. Nat Commun. 2024;15(1):1394.
  43. Jiang D, Christ S, Correa-Gallegos D, Ramesh P, Kalgudde Gopal S, Wannemacher J, et al. Injury triggers fascia fibroblast collective cell migration to drive scar formation through N-cadherin. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):5653.
  44. Wan L, Jiang D, Correa-Gallegos D, Ramesh P, Zhao J, Ye H, et al. Connexin43 gap junction drives fascia mobilization and repair of deep skin wounds. Matrix Biol. 2021;97:58-71.
  45. Rajendran V, Ramesh P, Dai R, Kalgudde Gopal S, Ye H, Machens HG, et al. Therapeutic Silencing of p120 in Fascia Fibroblasts Ameliorates Tissue Repair. J Invest Dermatol. 2023;143(5):854-863.e4.
  46. Rinkevich Y, Walmsley GG, Hu MS, Maan ZN, Newman AM, Drukker M, et al. Skin fibrosis. Identification and isolation of a dermal lineage with intrinsic fibrogenic potential. Science. 2015;348(6232):aaa2151.
  47. Mascharak S, desJardins-Park HE, Davitt MF, Griffin M, Borrelli MR, Moore AL, et al. Preventing Engrailed-1 activation in fibroblasts yields wound regeneration without scarring. Science. 2021;372(6540).
  48. Xu X, Wang L, Bi X, Cao T, Gao M, Hu B, et al. Targeted silencing of Engrailed-1 reprograms profibrotic fibroblast lineage for scarless wound healing. Mol Ther. 2025;33(10):4889-4903.
  49. Ye H, Yu Q, Lee AJKS, Dong W, Chang Z, Correa-Gallegos D, et al. Distinct fibroblast assemblies establish scarless regeneration. Cell Rep. 2026;45(1):116767.
  50. Guo R, Dai R, Lin Y, Liu M, Moog P, Kwak MS, et al. Fascia-integrated functional mapping of ion channels promotes scar-tapered repair. J Invest Dermatol. 2026;.
  51. Sun Y, Chen Z, Zhang M, Zhang H, Li T, Li Y, et al. FOSL1-mediated super-enhancer facilitates pathological scarring. Cell Rep. 2026;45(7):117667.
  52. Kalgudde Gopal S, Dai R, Stefanska AM, Ansari M, Zhao J, Ramesh P, et al. Wound infiltrating adipocytes are not myofibroblasts. Nat Commun. 2023;14(1):3020.
  53. Uezumi A, Fukada S, Yamamoto N, Ikemoto-Uezumi M, Nakatani M, Morita M, et al. Identification and characterization of PDGFRα+ mesenchymal progenitors in human skeletal muscle. Cell Death Dis. 2014;5(4):e1186.
  54. Malecova B, Gatto S, Etxaniz U, Passafaro M, Cortez A, Nicoletti C, et al. Dynamics of cellular states of fibro-adipogenic progenitors during myogenesis and muscular dystrophy. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):3670.
  55. Scott RW, Arostegui M, Schweitzer R, Rossi FMV, Underhill TM. Hic1 Defines Quiescent Mesenchymal Progenitor Subpopulations with Distinct Functions and Fates in Skeletal Muscle Regeneration. Cell Stem Cell. 2019;25(6):797-813.e9.
  56. Contreras O, Rossi FM, Brandan E. Adherent muscle connective tissue fibroblasts are phenotypically and biochemically equivalent to stromal fibro/adipogenic progenitors. Matrix Biol Plus. 2019;2:100006.
  57. Contreras O. Hic1 deletion unleashes quiescent connective tissue stem cells and impairs skeletal muscle regeneration. J Cell Commun Signal. 2020;14(1):131-133.
  58. Lemos DR, Babaeijandaghi F, Low M, Chang CK, Lee ST, Fiore D, et al. Nilotinib reduces muscle fibrosis in chronic muscle injury by promoting TNF-mediated apoptosis of fibro/adipogenic progenitors. Nat Med. 2015;21(7):786-94.
  59. Dulauroy S, Di Carlo SE, Langa F, Eberl G, Peduto L. Lineage tracing and genetic ablation of ADAM12(+) perivascular cells identify a major source of profibrotic cells during acute tissue injury. Nat Med. 2012;18(8):1262-70.
  60. Heredia JE, Mukundan L, Chen FM, Mueller AA, Deo RC, Locksley RM, et al. Type 2 innate signals stimulate fibro/adipogenic progenitors to facilitate muscle regeneration. Cell. 2013;153(2):376-88.
  61. Wu P, Zhang Z, Zheng K, Zhu Z, Zhu Y, Kiram A, et al. RUNX2 Activation in Fibro/Adipogenic Progenitors Promotes Muscle Fibrosis in Muscular Dystrophy. Adv Sci (Weinh). 2026;13(13):e10850.
  62. Ferrand M, Rocca CJ, Corre G, Buffa V, Frin S, Garnache-Ottou F, et al. FAP-CAR-T cells reduce dystrophic muscle fibrosis, improving adeno-associated virus gene transfer efficacy. Mol Ther Methods Clin Dev. 2025;33(3):101545.
  63. Cruz-Soca M, Córdova-Casanova A, Faundez-Contreras J, Martínez NW, Vaccaro-Rivera F, Bazaes-Astorga S, et al. Lysophosphatidic acid mediates skeletal muscle fibrosis in denervation via activation of YAP/TAZ. JCI Insight. 2026;11(8).
  64. Urciuolo A, Quarta M, Morbidoni V, Gattazzo F, Molon S, Grumati P, et al. Collagen VI regulates satellite cell self-renewal and muscle regeneration. Nat Commun. 2013;4:1964.
  65. Gilbert PM, Havenstrite KL, Magnusson KE, Sacco A, Leonardi NA, Kraft P, et al. Substrate elasticity regulates skeletal muscle stem cell self-renewal in culture. Science. 2010;329(5995):1078-81.
  66. Rayagiri SS, Ranaldi D, Raven A, Mohamad Azhar NIF, Lefebvre O, Zammit PS, et al. Basal lamina remodeling at the skeletal muscle stem cell niche mediates stem cell self-renewal. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):1075.
  67. Baghdadi MB, Castel D, Machado L, Fukada SI, Birk DE, Relaix F, et al. Reciprocal signalling by Notch-Collagen V-CALCR retains muscle stem cells in their niche. Nature. 2018;557(7707):714-718.
  68. Baghdadi MB, Castel D, Machado L, Fukada SI, Birk DE, Relaix F, et al. Author Correction: Reciprocal signalling by Notch-Collagen V-CALCR retains muscle stem cells in their niche. Nature. 2025;647(8091):E4.
  69. Lukjanenko L, Jung MJ, Hegde N, Perruisseau-Carrier C, Migliavacca E, Rozo M, et al. Loss of fibronectin from the aged stem cell niche affects the regenerative capacity of skeletal muscle in mice. Nat Med. 2016;22(8):897-905.
  70. Lukjanenko L, Karaz S, Stuelsatz P, Gurriaran-Rodriguez U, Michaud J, Dammone G, et al. Aging Disrupts Muscle Stem Cell Function by Impairing Matricellular WISP1 Secretion from Fibro-Adipogenic Progenitors. Cell Stem Cell. 2019;24(3):433-446.e7.
  71. Li G, Zheng B, Meszaros LB, Vella JB, Usas A, Matsumoto T, et al. Identification and characterization of chondrogenic progenitor cells in the fascia of postnatal skeletal muscle. J Mol Cell Biol. 2011;3(6):369-77.
  72. Di Taranto G, Cicione C, Visconti G, Isgrò MA, Barba M, Di Stasio E, et al. Qualitative and quantitative differences of adipose-derived stromal cells from superficial and deep subcutaneous lipoaspirates: a matter of fat. Cytotherapy. 2015;17(8):1076-89.
  73. Chen G, Long J, Zhang Y, Zhou X, Gao B, Qin Z, et al. Fascia-derived stem cells enhance fat graft retention by promoting vascularization through the HMOX1-HIF-1α pathway. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2025;16(1):92.
  74. Zhang Y, Su X, Dong Y, Chen T, Zhang Y, Wu B, et al. Cytological and functional characteristics of fascia adipocytes in rats: A unique population of adipocytes. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Cell Biol Lipids. 2020;1865(2):158585.
  75. Pirri C, Pirri N, Petrelli L, De Caro R, Stecco C. Redefining Fascia: A Mechanobiological Hub and Stem Cell Reservoir in Regeneration—A Systematic Review. Int J Mol Sci. 2025;26(20):10166.
  76. Wang L, Johnson JA, Chang DW, Zhang Q. Decellularized musculofascial extracellular matrix for tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2013;34(11):2641-54.
  77. Vettese J, Manon J, Chretien A, Evrard R, Fievé L, Schubert T, et al. Collagen molecular organization preservation in human fascia lata and periosteum after tissue engineering. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024;12:1275709.
  78. Hung MJ, Wen MC, Huang YT, Chen GD, Chou MM, Yang VC. Fascia tissue engineering with human adipose-derived stem cells in a murine model: Implications for pelvic floor reconstruction. J Formos Med Assoc. 2014;113(10):704-15.
  79. Ayala P, Caves J, Dai E, Siraj L, Liu L, Chaudhuri O, et al. Engineered composite fascia for stem cell therapy in tissue repair applications. Acta Biomater. 2015;26:1-12.
  80. Su K, Edwards SL, Tan KS, White JF, Kandel S, Ramshaw JAM, et al. Induction of endometrial mesenchymal stem cells into tissue-forming cells suitable for fascial repair. Acta Biomater. 2014;10(12):5012-5020.
  81. Lo TS, Chen YP, Harun F, Shaw SW, Lin YH. The properties of absorbable scaffold harvested with human amniotic fluid stem cells on rat model: an innovation for pelvic reconstruction surgery. Sci Rep. 2024;14(1):12750.
  82. Tiengo C, Giatsidis G, Azzena B. Fascia lata allografts as biological mesh in abdominal wall repair: preliminary outcomes from a retrospective case series. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;132(4):631e-639e.
  83. Barber FA, Burns JP, Deutsch A, Labbé MR, Litchfield RB. A prospective, randomized evaluation of acellular human dermal matrix augmentation for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Arthroscopy. 2012;28(1):8-15.
  84. Lim S, Chun JM, Jeon IH. Rotator Cuff Repair with Autologous Fascia Lata Augmentation in Patients at High Risk for Repair Failure: Five-Year Follow-Up Outcomes. J Clin Med. 2026;15(16).
  85. Hasegawa A, Uchida A, Noguchi Y, Shimizu H, Fukunishi K, Mihata T. Donor site morbidity and patient satisfaction after arthroscopic superior capsule reconstruction using fascia lata autograft for irreparable rotator cuff tears. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2026;.
  86. Fede C, Angelini A, Stern R, Macchi V, Porzionato A, Ruggieri P, De Caro R, Stecco C. Quantification of hyaluronan in human fasciae: variations with function and anatomical site. J Anat. 2018;233(4):552–556.
  87. Ugwoke CK, Cvetko E, Umek N. Pathophysiological and Therapeutic Roles of Fascial Hyaluronan in Obesity-Related Myofascial Disease. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(19):11843.
  88. Stecco A, Cowman M, Pirri N, Raghavan P, Pirri C. Densification: Hyaluronan Aggregation in Different Human Organs. Bioengineering (Basel). 2022;9(4):159.
  89. Kirkness KB, Scarlata S. Understanding Fascial Tissue on the Molecular Level—How Its Unique Properties Enable Adaptation or Dysfunction. Int J Mol Sci. 2025;27(1):160.
  90. Kirkness KB, da Silva FC, Schleip R, Cruvinel-Júnior RH, Scarlata S. The myofascial rheostat: hyaluronan molecular weight dynamics and purinergic signalling as a physiological feedback system. Front Physiol. 2026;17:1854585.
  91. Cowman MK, Schmidt TA, Raghavan P, Stecco A. Viscoelastic Properties of Hyaluronan in Physiological Conditions. F1000Research. 2015;4:622.
  92. Pratt RL. Hyaluronan and the Fascial Frontier. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(13):6845.
  93. Pavan PG, Stecco A, Stern R, Stecco C. Painful connections: densification versus fibrosis of fascia. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2014;18(8):441.
  94. Raghavan P, Lu Y, Mirchandani M, Stecco A. Human Recombinant Hyaluronidase Injections For Upper Limb Muscle Stiffness in Individuals With Cerebral Injury: A Case Series. EBioMedicine. 2016;9:306-313.
  95. Carroll P, Boudreau A, Hu H, Lin RP, Louzati B, Davis E. Combination Hyaluronidase and Triamcinolone Acetonide Enzymatic Injections for Treatment of Ledderhose Disease: A Novel Technique and Case Series. Clin Pract. 2026;16(2).
  96. Stecco C, Gagey O, Belloni A, Pozzuoli A, Porzionato A, Macchi V, Aldegheri R, De Caro R, Delmas V. Anatomy of the deep fascia of the upper limb. Second part: study of innervation. Morphologie. 2007;91(292):38–43.
  97. Woo SH, Lukacs V, de Nooij JC, Zaytseva D, Criddle CR, Francisco A, Jessell TM, Wilkinson KA, Patapoutian A. Piezo2 is the principal mechanotransduction channel for proprioception. Nat Neurosci. 2015;18(12):1756–1762.
  98. Mense S, Hoheisel U. Evidence for the existence of nociceptors in rat thoracolumbar fascia. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2016;20(3):623–628.
  99. Vogel S, Magerl W, Treede RD, Schilder A. Dose-Dependent Pain and Pain Radiation after Chemical Stimulation of the Thoracolumbar Fascia and Multifidus Muscle: A Randomized, Controlled Human Experimental Trial. Life (Basel). 2022;12(3):340.
  100. Deising S, Weinkauf B, Blunk J, Obreja O, Schmelz M, Rukwied R. NGF-evoked sensitization of muscle fascia nociceptors in humans. Pain. 2012;153(8):1673–1679.
  101. Hoheisel U, Taguchi T, Treede RD, Mense S. Nociceptive input from the rat thoracolumbar fascia to lumbar dorsal horn neurones. Eur J Pain. 2011;15(8):810–815.
  102. Taguchi T, Yasui M, Kubo A, Abe M, Kiyama H, Yamanaka A, Mizumura K. Nociception originating from the crural fascia in rats. Pain. 2013;154(7):1103–1114.
  103. Huijing PA. Myofascial force transmission between a single muscle head and adjacent tissues: length effects of head III of rat EDL. J Appl Physiol. 2003;94(5):1848–1859.
  104. Huijing PA. Epimuscular myofascial force transmission: a historical review and implications for new research. International Society of Biomechanics Muybridge Award Lecture, Taipei, 2007. J Biomech. 2009;42(1):9–21.
  105. Finni T, Cronin NJ, Mayfield D, Lichtwark GA, Cresswell AG. Effects of muscle activation on shear between human soleus and gastrocnemius muscles. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2017;27(1):26–34.
  106. Wilke J, Krause F, Vogt L, Banzer W. What Is Evidence-Based About Myofascial Chains: A Systematic Review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016;97(3):454–461.
  107. Krause F, Wilke J, Vogt L, Banzer W. Intermuscular force transmission along myofascial chains: a systematic review. J Anat. 2016;228(6):910–918.
  108. Ajimsha MS, Shenoy PD, Surendran PJ, Jacob P, Bilal MJ. Evidence of in-vivo myofascial force transfer in humans - a systematic scoping review. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2022;32:183–195.
  109. Li Z, Lee H, Zhu C. Molecular mechanisms of mechanotransduction in integrin-mediated cell-matrix adhesion. Exp Cell Res. 2016;349(1):85–94.
  110. Wang JHC, Thampatty BP, Lin JS, Im HJ. Mechanoregulation of gene expression in fibroblasts. Gene. 2007;391(1–2):1–15.
  111. Tu S, Li Y, Li J, Ma N, Yao K, Chen Z, Fan Z, Xu Z, Sa Y, Jia P, Lin X, Wang S, Fang Y, Liu Y, Guo Y. Mechanical stretch-mediated fibroblast activation: The pivotal role of Piezo1 channels. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Cell Res. 2025;1872(7):120008.
  112. Liu F, Lagares D, Choi KM, Stopfer L, Marinković A, Vrbanac V, Probst CK, Hiemer SE, Sisson TH, Horowitz JC, Rosas IO, Fredenburgh LE, Feghali-Bostwick C, Varelas X, Tager AM, Tschumperlin DJ. Mechanosignaling through YAP and TAZ drives fibroblast activation and fibrosis. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2015;308(4):L344–L357.
  113. Klingberg F, Chow ML, Koehler A, Boo S, Buscemi L, Quinn TM, Costell M, Alman BA, Genot E, Hinz B. Prestress in the extracellular matrix sensitizes latent TGF-β1 for activation. J Cell Biol. 2014;207(2):283–297.
  114. Pirri C, Caroccia B, Angelini A, Piazza M, Petrelli L, Caputo I, et al. A New Player in the Mechanobiology of Deep Fascia: Yes-Associated Protein (YAP). Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(20).
  115. Caroccia B, Caputo I, Bertoldi G, Favaro V, Angelini A, Benetti A, et al. Angiotensin II Activates Yes-Associated Protein (YAP) in Fibroblast Promoting Deep Fascia Remodeling. Int J Mol Sci. 2025;26(22).
  116. Pirri C, Caroccia B, Angelini A, Petrelli L, Piazza M, Biz C, et al. Evidence of Renin-Angiotensin System Receptors in Deep Fascia: A Role in Extracellular Matrix Remodeling and Fibrogenesis? Biomedicines. 2022;10(10).
  117. Fede C, Sun Y, Zhao X, Angelini A, Ruggieri P, Stecco C. Effect of Androgens on Human Fascia. Biology (Basel). 2025;14(7).
  118. Langevin HM, Bouffard NA, Churchill DL, Badger GJ. Connective tissue fibroblast response to acupuncture: dose-dependent effect of bidirectional needle rotation. J Altern Complement Med. 2007;13(3):355–360.
  119. Langevin HM, Yandow JA. Relationship of acupuncture points and meridians to connective tissue planes. Anat Rec. 2002;269(6):257-65.
  120. Langevin HM, Churchill DL, Cipolla MJ. Mechanical signaling through connective tissue: a mechanism for the therapeutic effect of acupuncture. FASEB J. 2001;15(12):2275-82.
  121. Langevin HM, Bouffard NA, Badger GJ, Churchill DL, Howe AK. Subcutaneous tissue fibroblast cytoskeletal remodeling induced by acupuncture: evidence for a mechanotransduction-based mechanism. J Cell Physiol. 2006;207(3):767-74.
  122. Langevin HM, Fujita T, Bouffard NA, Takano T, Koptiuch C, Badger GJ, Nedergaard M. Fibroblast cytoskeletal remodeling induced by tissue stretch involves ATP signaling. J Cell Physiol. 2013;228(9):1922–1926.
  123. Berrueta L, Muskaj I, Olenich S, Butler T, Badger GJ, Colas RA, Spite M, Serhan CN, Langevin HM. Stretching Impacts Inflammation Resolution in Connective Tissue. J Cell Physiol. 2016;231(7):1621–1627.
  124. Gerwin RD, Dommerholt J, Shah JP. An expansion of Simons’ integrated hypothesis of trigger point formation. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2004;8(6):468-475.
  125. Rathbone ATL, Grosman-Rimon L, Kumbhare DA. Interrater Agreement of Manual Palpation for Identification of Myofascial Trigger Points: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Clin J Pain. 2017;33(8):715-729.
  126. Quintner JL, Bove GM, Cohen ML. A critical evaluation of the trigger point phenomenon. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2015;54(3):392-399.
  127. Dommerholt J, Gerwin RD. A critical evaluation of Quintner et al: missing the point. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2015;19(2):193-204.
  128. Shah JP, Phillips TM, Danoff JV, Gerber LH. An in vivo microanalytical technique for measuring the local biochemical milieu of human skeletal muscle. J Appl Physiol. 2005;99(5):1977-1984.
  129. Shah JP, Danoff JV, Desai MJ, Parikh S, Nakamura LY, Phillips TM, Gerber LH. Biochemicals associated with pain and inflammation are elevated in sites near to and remote from active myofascial trigger points. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008;89(1):16-23.
  130. Sikdar S, Shah JP, Gebreab T, Yen RH, Gilliams E, Danoff J, Gerber LH. Novel applications of ultrasound technology to visualize and characterize myofascial trigger points and surrounding soft tissue. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009;90(11):1829-1838.
  131. Ballyns JJ, Shah JP, Hammond J, Gebreab T, Gerber LH, Sikdar S. Objective sonographic measures for characterizing myofascial trigger points associated with cervical pain. J Ultrasound Med. 2011;30(10):1331-1340.
  132. Mazza DF, Boutin RD, Chaudhari AJ. Assessment of Myofascial Trigger Points via Imaging: A Systematic Review. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2021;100(10):1003-1014.
  133. Wilke J, Debertshaeuser J, Konrad F. Differences in the Thoracolumbar Fascia Between Low Back Pain Patients and Healthy Individuals: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis. Sports Med Open. 2026;12:116.
  134. Langevin HM, Stevens-Tuttle D, Fox JR, Badger GJ, Bouffard NA, Krag MH, Wu J, Henry SM. Ultrasound evidence of altered lumbar connective tissue structure in human subjects with chronic low back pain. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2009;10:151.
  135. Pirri C, Pirri N, Guidolin D, Macchi V, Porzionato A, De Caro R, Stecco C. Ultrasound Imaging of Thoracolumbar Fascia Thickness: Chronic Non-Specific Lower Back Pain versus Healthy Subjects; A Sign of a “Frozen Back”? Diagnostics. 2023;13(8):1436.
  136. Langevin HM, Fox JR, Koptiuch C, Badger GJ, Greenan-Naumann AC, Bouffard NA, Konofagou EE, Lee WN, Triano JJ, Henry SM. Reduced thoracolumbar fascia shear strain in human chronic low back pain. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2011;12:203.
  137. Tomita N, Roy-Cardinal MH, Chayer B, Daher S, Attiya A, Boulanger A, Gaudreault N, Cloutier G, Bureau NJ. Thoracolumbar fascia ultrasound shear strain differs between low back pain and asymptomatic individuals: expanding the evidence. Insights Imaging. 2025;16:18.
  138. Ribeiro DC, Belgrave A, Naden A, Fang H, Matthews P, Parshottam S. The prevalence of myofascial trigger points in neck and shoulder-related disorders: a systematic review of the literature. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018;19(1):252.
  139. Meyers A, Marquart M. Plantar Fibromatosis. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing.
  140. Lemont H, Ammirati KM, Usen N. Plantar fasciitis: a degenerative process (fasciosis) without inflammation. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2003;93(3):234-237.
  141. van Leeuwen KDB, Rogers J, Winzenberg T, van Middelkoop M. Higher body mass index is associated with plantar fasciopathy/‘plantar fasciitis’: systematic review and meta-analysis of various clinical and imaging risk factors. Br J Sports Med. 2016;50(16):972-981.
  142. McMillan AM, Landorf KB, Barrett JT, Menz HB, Bird AR. Diagnostic imaging for chronic plantar heel pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Foot Ankle Res. 2009;2:32.
  143. Aggarwal P, Jirankali V, Garg SK. Evaluation of plantar fascia using high-resolution ultrasonography in clinically diagnosed cases of plantar fasciitis. Pol J Radiol. 2020;85:e375-e380.
  144. Wang X, Xu L, Hu X, Zhao H, Yin J. Musculoskeletal Ultrasound for the Diagnosis of Plantar Fasciitis: An Accuracy and Diagnostic Yield Study. Int J Gen Med. 2023;16:4765-4771.
  145. Albano D, Messina C, Gitto S, Serpi F, Basile M, Acquasanta M, Lanza E, Sconfienza LM. Shear-wave elastography of the plantar fascia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Ultrasound. 2023.
  146. Hansen L, Krogh TP, Ellingsen T, Bolvig L, Fredberg U. Long-Term Prognosis of Plantar Fasciitis: A 5- to 15-Year Follow-up Study of 174 Patients With Ultrasound Examination. Orthop J Sports Med. 2018;6(3):2325967118757983.
  147. Lanting R, Broekstra DC, Werker PM, van den Heuvel ER. A systematic review and meta-analysis on the prevalence of Dupuytren disease in the general population of Western countries. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;133(3):593-603.
  148. Salari N, Heydari M, Hassanabadi M, et al. The worldwide prevalence of the Dupuytren disease: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis. J Orthop Surg Res. 2020;15(1):495.
  149. Ng M, Thakkar D, Southam L, et al. A Genome-wide Association Study of Dupuytren Disease Reveals 17 Additional Variants Implicated in Fibrosis. Am J Hum Genet. 2017;101(3):417-427.
  150. Dolmans GH, Werker PM, Hennies HC, et al. Wnt signaling and Dupuytren’s disease. N Engl J Med. 2011;365(4):307-317.
  151. Hindocha S, Iqbal SA, Farhatullah S, Paus R, Bayat A. Characterization of stem cells in Dupuytren’s disease. Br J Surg. 2011;98(2):308-15.
  152. Iqbal SA, Manning C, Syed F, Kolluru V, Hayton M, Watson S, et al. Identification of mesenchymal stem cells in perinodular fat and skin in Dupuytren’s disease: a potential source of myofibroblasts with implications for pathogenesis and therapy. Stem Cells Dev. 2012;21(4):609-22.
  153. Koh SP, On N, Brasch HD, Chibnall AM, Armstrong JR, Davis PF, et al. Embryonic Stem Cell-like Population in Dupuytren’s Disease. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2016;4(11):e1064.
  154. Bodansky DMS, Begaj I, Evison F, Webber M, Woodman CB, Tucker ON. A 16-year Longitudinal Cohort Study of Incidence and Outcomes of Necrotizing Fasciitis in England. World J Surg. 2020;44(8):2580-2591.
  155. Yeh YS, Chen PJ, Huang SC, Chang CH, Yang H, Lee TN, Fang CT, Cheng NC. Global epidemiology and mortality trends of necrotizing fasciitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis with a focus on monomicrobial Gram-negative infections. Int J Surg. 2026;112(4):10523-10535.
  156. van den Heuvel-Weiss C, Goossens S, Janssen L, van Eerten P, de Bie R, Scheltinga M. Fasciotomy for Chronic Exertional Compartment Syndrome of the Deep Posterior Lower Leg Compartment: A Prospective Study. Clin J Sport Med. 2025;35(3):252-258.
  157. Krielen P, Stommel MWJ, Pargmae P, Bouvy ND, Bakkum EA, Ellis H, Parker MC, Griffiths EA, van Goor H, Ten Broek RPG. Adhesion-related readmissions after open and laparoscopic surgery: a retrospective cohort study (SCAR update). Lancet. 2020;395(10217):33-41.
  158. Chu H, et al. Prevalence and risk factors of chronic postoperative inguinal pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hernia. 2024;28(4):967-987.
  159. Weibel S, Neubert K, Jelting Y, et al. Incidence and severity of chronic pain after caesarean section: A systematic review with meta-analysis. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2016;33(11):853-865.
  160. Craig ME, Duffin AC, Gallego PH, Lam A, Cusumano J, Hing S, Donaghue KC. Plantar fascia thickness, a measure of tissue glycation, predicts the development of complications in adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2008;31(6):1201-1206.
  161. Schanz S, Henes J, Ulmer A, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging findings in patients with systemic scleroderma and musculoskeletal symptoms. Eur Radiol. 2013;23(1):212-221.
  162. Gibson W, Arendt-Nielsen L, Taguchi T, Mizumura K, Graven-Nielsen T. Increased pain from muscle fascia following eccentric exercise: animal and human findings. Exp Brain Res. 2009;194(2):299-308.
  163. Brandl A, Wilke J, Egner C, Reer R, Schmidt T, Schleip R. Effects of experimental muscle and fascia pain on pressure pain thresholds and neuromuscular function. Pflugers Arch. 2023.
  164. Schadmy Levy S, Weiss K, Kalichman L. Ultrasound evaluation of deep fascia thickness: Reliability and association with clinically evaluated changes. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2024;40:350–355.
  165. Chen B, Zhao H, Liao L, Zhang Z, Liu C. Reliability of shear-wave elastography in assessing thoracolumbar fascia elasticity in healthy male. Sci Rep. 2020;10:19952.
  166. Ley CD, Martinez Valdes E, Murtagh CF, Power J, Drust B. Shear wave elastography provides reliable assessments of stiffness in the skin, fascia, and both superficial and deep muscle tissues. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2025;84:103050.
  167. Baur D, Schwabl C, Kremser C, Taljanovic MS, Widmann G, Sconfienza LM, Sztankay J, Feuchtner G, Klauser AS. Shear Wave Elastography of the Plantar Fascia: Comparison between Patients with Plantar Fasciitis and Healthy Control Subjects. J Clin Med. 2021;10(11):2351.
  168. Ostelo RWJG, Deyo RA, Stratford P, Waddell G, Croft P, Von Korff M, Bouter LM, de Vet HC. Interpreting change scores for pain and functional status in low back pain: towards international consensus regarding minimal important change. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008;33(1):90-94.
  169. Chiarotto A, Clijsen R, Fernandez-de-Las-Penas C, Barbero M. Prevalence of Myofascial Trigger Points in Spinal Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016;97(2):316-337.
  170. Landorf KB, Twyford GN, Cotchett MP, Whittaker GA. Revised minimal important difference values for the visual analogue scale and Foot Health Status Questionnaire when used for plantar heel pain. J Foot Ankle Res. 2024;17(4):e70021.
  171. Landorf KB, Radford JA, Hudson S. Minimal Important Difference (MID) of two commonly used outcome measures for foot problems. J Foot Ankle Res. 2010;3:7.
  172. Chen Z, Wu J, Wang X, Wu J, Ren Z. The effects of myofascial release technique for patients with low back pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Complement Ther Med. 2021;59:102737.
  173. Wu Z, Wang Y, Ye X, Chen Z, Zhou R, Ye Z, Huang J, Zhu Y, Chen G, Xu X. Myofascial release for chronic low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Med. 2021;8:697986.
  174. Laimi K, Mäkilä A, Bärlund E, Katajapuu N, Oksanen A, Seikkula V, et al. Effectiveness of myofascial release in treatment of chronic musculoskeletal pain: a systematic review. Clin Rehabil. 2018;32(4):440-450.
  175. Löbell R, Glänzel MH, Prates IM, Petter GDN, Marqueti RC, de Oliveira RR, et al. Short-term effectiveness of massage techniques on myotendinous structures’ stiffness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Res Sports Med. 2026;:1-26.
  176. Tomita N, Croteau D, Roy-Cardinal MH, Choinière M, Benhaïm L, Raby S, et al. Quantitative ultrasound evaluation of the thoracolumbar fascia after manual and acupuncture therapies: an exploratory mechanistic randomized controlled trial with a sequential within-subject phase. Eur Radiol Exp. 2026;10(1).
  177. Tang S, Sheng L, Wei X, Liang M, Xia J, Chen J. The effectiveness of instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization on pain and function in patients with musculoskeletal disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025;26(1):257.
  178. Konrad A, Nakamura M, Tilp M, Donti O, Behm DG. Foam Rolling Training Effects on Range of Motion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Sports Med. 2022;52(10):2523-2535.
  179. Konrad A, Nakamura M, Behm DG. The Effects of Foam Rolling Training on Performance Parameters: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis including Controlled and Randomized Controlled Trials. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(18).
  180. Glänzel MH, Rodrigues DR, Petter GN, Pozzobon D, Vaz MA, Geremia JM. Foam Rolling Acute Effects on Myofascial Tissue Stiffness and Muscle Strength: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Strength Cond Res. 2023;37(4):951-968.
  181. Ormeno L, Driller M. Does Massage Gun or Foam Roller Use During a Warm-Up Improve Performance in Trained Athletes? Sports (Basel). 2025;13(9).
  182. Warneke K, Rabitsch T, Dobert P, Wilke J. The effects of static and dynamic stretching on deep fascia stiffness: a randomized, controlled cross-over study. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2024;124(9):2809-2818.
  183. Rathleff MS, Mølgaard CM, Fredberg U, Kaalund S, Andersen KB, Jensen TT, et al. High-load strength training improves outcome in patients with plantar fasciitis: A randomized controlled trial with 12-month follow-up. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2015;25(3):e292-300.
  184. Chen Y, Sun Y, Ai S, Wang Q. Comparison of dry needling with physical modalities for myofascial trigger point of patients with neck pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2025;45:493-501.
  185. Rabanal-Rodríguez G, Simón-Alonso MA, Navarro-Santana MJ, Fernández-de-Las-Peñas C, Albert-Lucena D, Díaz-Arribas MJ, et al. Frequency and severity of adverse events associated with dry needling: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Phys Ther. 2026;106(6).
  186. Lin MT, Liao CL, Hsiao MY, Hsueh HW, Chao CC, Wu CH. Volume Matters in Ultrasound-Guided Perineural Dextrose Injection for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Three-Arm Trial. Front Pharmacol. 2020;11:625830.
  187. Azizi F, Saber Gharesoo F, Eidy F, Heidari S, Maghbouli N, Djalalinia S, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness of perineural dextrose injection in peripheral compression neuropathies of the upper limbs. Heliyon. 2025;11(1):e41622.
  188. Lee K, Park JM, Yoon SY, Kim MS, Kim YW, Shin JI, et al. Ultrasound-Guided Nerve Hydrodissection for the Management of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis. Yonsei Med J. 2025;66(2):111-120.
  189. Ge Y, Liu Z, Wu W, Zhang M, Gan Y. Effect of ultrasound-guided fascial plane block (UGPB) on pain control of rib fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Anesthesiol. 2026;26(1).
  190. Espinosa FA, Barba-Jaramillo ED, Aufranc JRV, Navarro-Navarro CJ, González-Ortega PH, Camba-Gutiérrez SI. Comparative Effectiveness of Fascial Plane Blocks for Postoperative Analgesia in Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Obes Surg. 2026;36(7):3947-3966.
  191. Zhao P, He Y, Li M, Wang J, Wang R, Cui X. Comparative efficacy and acceptability of different intensity levels of extracorporeal shock wave therapy in adults with plantar heel pain: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. PM R. 2025;17(12):1481-1493.
  192. Lippi L, Folli A, Moalli S, Turco A, Ammendolia A, de Sire A, Invernizzi M. Efficacy and tolerability of extracorporeal shock wave therapy in patients with plantar fasciopathy: a systematic review with meta-analysis and meta-regression. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2024;60(5):832-846.
  193. Guede-Rojas F, Rodriguez-Lagos L, Carvajal-Parodi C. Effectiveness of Radial Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy Versus Other Electrophysical Modalities on Pain and Functionality in Patients With Plantar Fasciitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Foot Ankle Spec. 2026;:19386400261449323.
  194. Guimarães JS, Arcanjo FL, Leporace G, Metsavaht LF, Conceição CS, Moreno MVMG, et al. Effects of therapeutic interventions on pain due to plantar fasciitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Rehabil. 2023;37(6):727-746.
  195. Ferlito JV, Silva CF, Almeida JC, da Silva Lopes IA, da Silva Almeida R, Leal-Junior ECP, et al. Effects of photobiomodulation therapy (PBMT) on the management of pain intensity and disability in plantar fasciitis: systematic review and meta-analysis. Lasers Med Sci. 2023;38(1):163.
  196. Naterstad IF, Joensen J, Bjordal JM, Couppé C, Lopes-Martins RAB, Stausholm MB. Efficacy of low-level laser therapy in patients with lower extremity tendinopathy or plantar fasciitis: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ Open. 2022;12(9):e059479.
  197. Li X, Yang J, Li S, Yang L, Meng D. The efficacy of ultrasound for plantar fasciitis, a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Med. 2025;57(1):2543056.
  198. Jenkins LC, Verhagen AP, Amorim M, Cavanagh N, Henderson-Foley S, Larosa M, et al. The Efficacy of Dry Cupping Compared to Placebo Cupping for People With Musculoskeletal Complaints: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis. JOSPT Open. 2026;4(1):23-35.
  199. David JA, Sankarapandian V, Christopher PR, Chatterjee A, Macaden AS. Injected corticosteroids for treating plantar heel pain in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;6(6):CD009348.
  200. Mosca M, Fuiano M, Massimi S, Censoni D, Catanese G, Grassi A, et al. Ruptures of the Plantar Fascia: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Foot Ankle Spec. 2022;15(3):272-282.
  201. Soares AP, et al. Botulinum toxin for myofascial pain syndromes in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014.
  202. Li Q, Zhang J, Sun J, Gao C, Zhao J. Therapeutic efficacy and safety of botulinum toxin A injection in plantar fasciitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2024;19(12):e0312908.
  203. Saltychev M, Miikkulainen A, Juhola J. Efficacy of botulinum toxin in myofascial pain in neck and shoulder-systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Rehabil Res. 2025;48(2):83-89.
  204. Fong HPY, Zhu MT, Rabago DP, Reeves KD, Chung VCH, Sit RWS. Effectiveness of Hypertonic Dextrose Injection (Prolotherapy) in Plantar Fasciopathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2023;104(11):1941-1953.e9.
  205. Whittaker GA, Munteanu SE, Menz HB, Tan JM, Rabusin CL, Landorf KB. Foot orthoses for plantar heel pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med. 2018;52(5):322-328.
  206. Zhang L, Chen L, Zhang X, Chen J, Luo Y. Effectiveness of low-dye taping in the treatment of patients with plantar fasciitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2026;105(8):e46770.
  207. Hohmann E, Tetsworth K, Glatt V. Platelet-Rich Plasma Versus Corticosteroids for the Treatment of Plantar Fasciitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2021;49(5):1381-1393.
  208. Zuo A, Gao C, Jia Q, Zhang M, Fu T, Li T, et al. Platelet-Rich Plasma Versus Corticosteroids in the Treatment of Plantar Fasciitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2025;104(7):613-621.
  209. Atilano L, Martin N, Ignacio Martin J, Iglesias G, Mendiola J, Bully P, et al. Ultrasound-Guided Subfascial Platelet-Rich Plasma Injections Versus Enthesis Needling for Greater Trochanteric Pain Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Orthop J Sports Med. 2024;12(5):23259671241249123.
  210. Zelen CM, Poka A, Andrews J. Prospective, randomized, blinded, comparative study of injectable micronized dehydrated amniotic/chorionic membrane allograft for plantar fasciitis–a feasibility study. Foot Ankle Int. 2013;34(10):1332-9.
  211. Cazzell S, Stewart J, Agnew PS, Senatore J, Walters J, Murdoch D, et al. Randomized Controlled Trial of Micronized Dehydrated Human Amnion/Chorion Membrane (dHACM) Injection Compared to Placebo for the Treatment of Plantar Fasciitis. Foot Ankle Int. 2018;39(10):1151-1161.
  212. Hanselman AE, Tidwell JE, Santrock RD. Cryopreserved human amniotic membrane injection for plantar fasciitis: a randomized, controlled, double-blind pilot study. Foot Ankle Int. 2015;36(2):151-8.
  213. Kumai T, Samoto N, Hasegawa A, Noguchi H, Shiranita A, Shiraishi M, et al. Short-term efficacy and safety of hyaluronic acid injection for plantar fasciopathy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018;26(3):903-911.
  214. de Cesar Netto C, Day J, Auster H, Schon L. Outcomes of iliac crest bone marrow aspirate injection in the treatment of recalcitrant plantar fasciitis. Int Orthop. 2026;50(2):463-467.
  215. Gusenoff BR, Minteer D, Gusenoff JA. Perforating Fat Injections for Chronic Plantar Fasciitis: A Randomized, Crossover Clinical Trial. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2022;149(2):297e-302e.
  216. Shaheen MS, Karjalainen VL, Reddy A, Karjalainen T, Chung KC. Effectiveness and Safety of Dupuytren Contracture Treatments: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Using the GRADE Approach. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2025;156(3):375e-384e.
  217. Dias J, Tharmanathan P, Arundel C, Welch C, Wu Q, Leighton P, et al. Collagenase injection versus limited fasciectomy surgery to treat Dupuytren’s contracture in adult patients in the UK: DISC, a non-inferiority RCT and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess. 2024;28(78):1-262.
  218. Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc. XIAFLEX (collagenase clostridium histolyticum) for injection, for intralesional use - US prescribing information. BLA 125338 supplement s111. 2023.
  219. European Medicines Agency. Public statement: Xiapex (collagenase clostridium histolyticum) - withdrawal of the marketing authorisation in the European Union. European Commission decision 5 December 2019; effective 1 March 2020.
  220. Endo Operations Ltd. Discontinuation report: XIAFLEX. Drug Shortages Canada report 118623; market status “cancelled post market”; actual discontinuation date 15 June 2020; reason: business reasons.
  221. US Food and Drug Administration, Center for Devices and Radiological Health. Premarket Approval (PMA) database record P000048: Dornier Epos Ultra (Dornier MedTech America, Inc.); approval 15 January 2002; withdrawal 15 August 2018. FDA Accessdata.
  222. US Food and Drug Administration, Center for Devices and Radiological Health. Premarket Approval (PMA) database record P040026: Orthospec Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy Device (Medispec, Ltd.); approval 1 April 2005. FDA Accessdata.
  223. US Food and Drug Administration, Center for Devices and Radiological Health. 510(k) Premarket Notification database record K181367: Tenex Health TX System with the TXP MicroTip (Tenex Health, Inc.); decision “substantially equivalent” 28 August 2018. FDA Accessdata.
  224. Saghir MA, Bashandy AS, Kholeif AM. Endoscopic plantar fasciotomy versus open plantar fasciotomy for treatment of plantar fasciitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Orthop Surg Res. 2026;21(1).
  225. Pérez González A, Sanz-Perez A, Moroni S, Razzano C, Vicente-Mampel J, Ferrer-Torregrosa J. Gastrocnemius Recession in Recalcitrant Plantar Fasciitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. J Clin Med. 2026;15(2).
  226. Jessup RL, Oates MJ, Johnston RV, Buchbinder R. Shockwave therapy for plantar heel pain (plantar fasciitis) [protocol]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019;2019(11).
  227. Nakagawa H, Ashkani-Esfahani S, Waryasz GR, Panero A, Sussman WI. Application of amniotic membrane allograft in the treatment of foot and ankle pathologies: a review of the basic science and clinical evidence. J Foot Ankle Surg (Asia-Pacific). 2023;10(1):209-215.
  228. Nweke TC. Comprehensive review and evidence-based treatment framework for optimizing plantar fasciitis diagnosis and management. Cureus. 2025;17(7):e88745.
  229. Gao Y, Gao D. Myofascial release and fascial-targeted mechanical interventions in musculoskeletal rehabilitation: mechanisms, modalities, and integrative physiology. Front Physiol. 2026;17:1801306.
  230. Bi Y, Ehirchiou D, Kilts TM, Inkson CA, Embree MC, Sonoyama W, et al. Identification of tendon stem/progenitor cells and the role of the extracellular matrix in their niche. Nat Med. 2007;13(10):1219-27.
  231. Kjaer M. Role of extracellular matrix in adaptation of tendon and skeletal muscle to mechanical loading. Physiol Rev. 2004;84(2):649–698.

Creative Commons License

Genesis Scientific Publication is licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0

Submit Manuscript
whatsapp