Knowledge, Attitude and Perception of Oral Health Among Parents of Children at Risk of Infective Endocarditis Attending Pediatric Cardiology Center Of King Fahad Medical City

  1. Home
  2. Articles

Knowledge, Attitude and Perception of Oral Health Among Parents of Children at Risk of Infective Endocarditis Attending Pediatric Cardiology Center Of King Fahad Medical City

   

Lama Almashham* 

King Fahad Medical City, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia 

*Corresponding author: Lama Almashham, King Fahad Medical City, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
 
Citation: Almashham L. (2022) Knowledge, Attitude and Perception of Oral Health Among Parents of Children at Risk of Infective Endocarditis Attending Pediatric Cardiology Center Of King Fahad Medical City. J Oral Med and Dent Res. 3(2):1-27.
Received: December 13, 2022 | Published: December 23, 2022

Copyright© 2022 genesis pub by Almashham L. CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 DEED. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial-No Derivatives 4.0 International License., This allows others distribute, remix, tweak, and build upon the work, even commercially, as long as they credit the authors for the original creation.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.52793/JOMDR.2022.3(2)-27

Abstract

Infective endocarditis is known to be a serious complication, mostly in patients who are susceptible of cardiac conditions. It is well established that there is a relationship between oral microorganisms and the development of infective endocarditis.

Objectives: The objective of this study is to determine the knowledge of the parents of children at risk for infective endocarditis, the preventive behaviours practiced, and the oral health status of the children.

Materials and Methods: A questionnaire will be distributed to parents (n = 107) of children with known cardiac diseases using selective non-random sampling, with an age ranging from 0-12 years.

Results: Although the parents' knowledge of oral health was adequate, their attitudes regarding it were not. The parents in this study agreed that maintaining good dental health was crucial for overall body health.

Conclusion: Based on these results we can conclude that attitudes toward dental care and oral health among both parents and children need to be modified.

Keywords

 

Infective Endocarditis; Oral hygiene; Dental caries
 

Introduction

Infective Endocarditis (IE) is known to be a serious complication, mostly in patients who are susceptible of cardiac conditions (Cowper et al., 1996), such as those with congenital heart disease, valve replacements, cardiac implantable electronic devices, chronic rheumatic heart disease, nosocomial infection and poor oral hygiene (Süzük et al., 2016). It is well established that there is a relationship between oral microorganisms and the development of infective endocarditis. The causative microorganisms for infective endocarditis in most of the cases of patients with positive haemoculture are streptococci (Bayliss et al., 1983), with S. Viridans representing 50% of this group. Even under normal physiological conditions, poor oral hygiene can result in bacterima, which increases the likelihood of getting the disease permanently (Smith & Adams et al., 1993). Therefore, individuals who are at risk are highly encouraged to establish and maintain the most meticulous oral health habits in order to reduce the potential sources of bacteremias (Guntheroth, 1984; Wilson et al., 2008). There are scarce resources in the literature regarding children’s oral health with pre-existing congenital heart disease. However, some studies have shown that these children suffer poorer oral health compared with a control group (Berger, 1978; Franco et al., 1996; Hallett et al., 1992). Some reasons include their frequent consumption of sugared medicines, increased susceptibility of developmental enamel defects (Hallett et al., 1992), and negligence of oral hygiene as their worry of their cardiac condition outweighs care for meticulous oral hygiene (Berger, 1978; Franco et al., 1996; Gould & Picton, 1960; Hallett et al., 1992).

Considering all these aspects, the importance of evaluating oral health conditions of children at risk for infective endocarditis is obviously overlooked, so there is a rising demand to assess the current knowledge, attitude, and perception of their parents’ awareness. Therefore, the objective of this study is to determine the knowledge of the parents of children at risk for infective endocarditis, the preventive behaviours practiced, and the oral health status of the children.

Materials and Methods

In this cross-sectional study, a total of 112 parents of children with known cardiac diseases included in The American Heart Association (AHA) conditions that have a risk of IE, with an age ranging from infancy to 12 years of age and are attending the paediatric outpatient clinics at King Fahad Medical City (KFMC) during a period of six to eight weeks using selective non-random sampling. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of King Salman Heart Center, Saudi Arabia (IRB Log No. 22-482). 

A self-constructed questionnaire composed of 16 multiple choice questions that were written in Arabic language was distributed to parents/caregivers. Two questions were related to participants’ demographic information (sex and age group), the remaining fourteen questions were divided into four different categories covering oral hygiene habits, awareness of gingival health and plaque, knowledge and awareness of dental and general health, and attitudes towards professional dental care. Assessments of oral hygiene habits included brushing frequency and role of parents’ supervision.

Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistical software for Windows version 26.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, N.Y., USA). Descriptive statistics (frequencies and percentages) were used to describe the categorical variables. A nonparametric Pearson’s chi-square fitness of test was used to observe the statistical significance of observed categorical responses of 8 items of knowledge and 4 items of attitudes towards oral hygiene. A p-value of ≤ 0.05 was used to report the statistical significance of results [1-15].

Results

A total of 112 parents had responded to this study which assesses their knowledge and attitudes towards oral hygiene. Out of 112 parents, 60 (53.6%) of them answered for their male child, while the remaining 52 answered for their female child. Distribution regarding the age was the following: the smallest group was a minimum of 0 to 12 months (7.1%), while the most prevalent group were 9 to 12 years (29.5%). Regarding oral hygiene maintenance, about 50% of them had responded that their children do not brush their teeth, while only 12.5% of them were brushing their teeth twice a day. Regarding the role of parents in supervision of oral hygiene, 62.5% of them were only advising but do not watch their child brush their teeth, while 27.7% neither advice nor watch. Only 9.8% are attentive to their children by advising and watching them brush (Table 1).

Study variables

No. of Precentage (%)

Age groups

-

0 - 12 months

8(7.1)

2-4 years

25(31.3)

5-8 years

36(32.1)

9-12 years

33(29.5)

Gender

-

Male

60(53.6)

Female

52(46.4)

How many times do you brush your teeth?

-

I don’t brush my teeth

56(50.0)

Once in the morning

9(8.0)

Once in night

33(29.5)

Twice a day in morning and at night

14(12.5)

Role of parents in supervision of oral hygiene

Watch and advise

11(9.8)

Only advice but do not watch

70(62.5)

Parents don’t advice and don’t watch

31(27.7)

Table 1: Distribution of children’s age, gender and items related to oral hygiene (n=112).

Regarding their knowledge of oral hygiene and awareness of gingival health, 34.8% of parents answered that plaque is soft deposits on teeth that can be removed by manual brushing, which is significantly higher than other two options of responses (p=0.002). 66.1% of them said that gingivitis could be prevented by brushing the teeth and using dental floss, which is significantly higher than other three responses (p<0.0001). Regarding the knowledge of dental and general health, when asked about the effect of sweets on dental health, 97.3% replied in agreement, which is highly statistically significant (p<0.0001), while 2.7% had responded with denial. For the awareness of oral health effect on the cardiac condition, 91.1% were aware of the significance, whereases 8.9% had no clue about the association between them (Table 2).

Study variables

No. (%)

Χ2 -value

p-value

What does plaque mean?

 

 

 

Soft deposits on teeth that can be removed by manual brushing

36(32.1)

15.21

0.002

Heavy deposits on teeth that needs to be removed by the dentist

39(34.8)

 

 

Tooth discoloration

13(11.6)

 

 

I don’t know

24(21.4)

 

 

How to prevent gingivitis?

 

 

 

By brushing the teeth and using dental floss

74(66.1)

103.07

<0.0001

Taking vitamin C

11(9.8)

 

 

Eating soft food

8(7.1)

 

 

I don’t know

19(17.0)

 

 

Does sweets affect dental health?

 

 

 

Yes

109(97.3)

100.32

<0.0001

No

3(2.7)

 

 

I don’t know

--

 

 

Does discolored teeth affect your child’s appearance?

 

 

 

Yes

100(89.3)

69.14

<0.0001

No

12(10.7)

 

 

I don’t know

--

 

 

Does the health of mouth and teeth impact the health of body?

 

 

 

Yes

107(95.5)

92.89

<0.0001

No

5(4.5)

 

 

I don’t know

--

 

 

Does treatment of toothache as important as any organ in the body?

 

 

 

Yes

109(97.3)

100.32

<0.0001

No

3(2.7)

 

 

I don’t know

--

 

 

Are regular visits to the dentist necessary?

 

 

 

Yes

111(99.1)

108.04

<0.0001

No

1(0.9)

 

 

I don’t know

--

 

 

Do you know that the condition of a child’s mouth can adversely

 

 

 

effect his/her heart?

 

 

 

 Yes

102(91.1)

75.57

<0.0001

 No

--

 

 

 I don’t know

10(8.9)

 

 

Table 2: Distribution and comparison of parent’s responses related to the items of their knowledge towards oral hygiene.

On the assessment of the attitude towards professional dental care, 64.3% responded that they visit the dentist only when in pain, which is statistically significantly higher than the other two responses (regularly and occasionally or never) (p<0.0001). Concomitantly, pain happens to be the primary reason for their last visit to the dentist in 75.9% of the respondents. Regarding the reasons of not visiting the dentist, most of them justified it with the high cost (36.6%) among the five other reasons, which is highly statistically significant (p<0.0001). When the parents were asked about their interest in receiving more education about oral health and its impact on overall well-being, 58% of them responded affirmatively, while 22.3% of them were not interested, and 19.7% were neutral (Table 3).

Attitudes items

No. (%)

Χ2 -value

p-value

How often do you visit the dentist?

Regularly

13(11.6)

50.91

<0.0001

When in pain

72(64.3)

Occasionally or never

27(24.1)

 -

Reasons behind not visiting/dislike visiting the dentist

 -

 -

Fear

19(17.0)

20.86

<0.0001

High cost

41(36.6)

 -

No clinic nearby

15(13.4)

 -

No time

15(13.4)

 -

 -

No specific reason

22(19.6)

Reason of your last visit to the dentist

 -

Toothache

85(75.9)

155.21

<0.0001

Parents advice

6(5.4)

 -

 -

Dentists advice

11(9.8)

Other reasons

10(8.9)

Are you interested in educating yourself about the importance of oral health, its implication on general well-being (especially the heart)?

Yes

65(58.0)

30.87

<0.0001

No

25(22.3)

 -

I don’t know

22(19.7)

 -

Table 3: Distribution and comparison of parents responses related to the items of their Attitude towards oral hygiene.

Discussion

According to prior researches on knowledge, attitudes, and health behaviours, the cardiac group exhibited considerably worse dental health behaviours than the healthy group (da Silva et al., 2002; Grahn et al., 2006; Hallett et al., 1992; Saunders & Roberts, 1997; Suvarna et al., 2011).  Most of the participants in this study had responded that their children do not brush their teeth, while only 12.5% of them were brushing their teeth twice a day, which can be attributed to the fact that most of the parents in the study lack parental encouragement since they only advise but do not watch their child brush their teeth. This parental negligence of oral hygiene may be due to a greater concern with their cardiac condition (da Silva et al., 2002; Hallett et al., 1992). In contrast, Suvarna et al. (Suvarna et al., 2011) reported that there is a high percentage of children who are more mindful of brushing their teeth. It is well established that children with CHD are strongly advised to obtain vigorous dental care especially at young ages according to multiple studies (Grahn et al., 2006; Hallett et al., 1992). Awareness of gingival health and plaque were found to be satisfactory in our study as opposed to the study done by Suvarna et al. (Suvarna et al., 2011), which can be attributed to the fact that comprehensive dental public health programs have improved over the years in Saudi Arabia (Al-Hashem, 2016). 
 
The participants in this study demonstrated positive attitudes towards their dentists and high awareness of the link between oral health and systemic well-being, which is in agreement with Al-Omiri et al.’s study (Al-Omiri et al., 2006). However, most of the participants in this study stated that they visit the dentist only when in pain, which can be due to the fact that most of them justified lack of motivation to visit the dentist due to high cost of treatment, in contrast to another study by Al-Omiri et al. (Al-Omiri et al., 2006), fear was the topmost reason for not visiting the dentist. It could also be due to inadequate knowledge of the preventive measures. These findings are rather surprising in the sense that a good number of the participants had ample awareness of the fact that regular visits to the dentist are necessary, as mentioned in multiple studies (da Silva et al., 2002; Grahn et al., 2006; Saunders & Roberts, 1997; Suvarna et al., 2011). The majority of people were aware that having poor oral health puts their cardiovascular health at risk, yet in spite of this, they did not comply to literature's recommendations of regular dental visits.
Limitations to our study include no oral examination was performed to evaluate oral health status or quality of tooth brushing, and the short time of the study, as well as the small sample volume.
 

Conclusion

In summary, the present study concluded that Saudi Arabian parents acknowledged the value of dental health but made little attempt to put this understanding into practice. Therefore, parent’s and children’s attitudes towards oral health and dental care need to be improved by implementing comprehensive oral health educational programs for both children and their parents. Fortunately, most of the participants were willing to receive more education about oral health.
 

References

1. Al-Hashem A. Health education in Saudi Arabia: historical overview. Sultan Qaboos University Medical Journal. 2016 Aug;16(3):e286.
2. Al‐Omiri MK, Al‐Wahadni AM, Saeed KN. Oral health attitudes, knowledge, and behavior among school children in North Jordan. Journal of dental education. 2006 Feb;70(2):179-87.
3. Bayliss R, Clarke C, Oakley CM, Somerville W, Whitfield AG, Young SE. The microbiology and pathogenesis of infective endocarditis. Heart. 1983 Dec 1;50(6):513-9.
4. Berger EN. Attitudes and preventive dental health behaviour in children with congenital cardiac disease. Australian Dental Journal. 1978 Feb;23(1):87-90.
5. Cowper TR. Pharmacologic management of the patient with disorders of the cardiovascular system: infective endocarditis. Dental Clinics of North America. 1996 Jul 1;40(3):611-47.
6. Da Silva DB, Souza IP, Cunha MC. Knowledge, attitudes and status of oral health in children at risk for infective endocarditis. International journal of paediatric dentistry. 2002 Mar;12(2):124-31.
7. Gould MS, Picton DC. The gingival condition of congenitally cyanotic individuals. Br Dent J. 1960;109:96-100.
8. Grahn K, Wikström S, Nyman L, Rydberg A, STECKSÉN‐BLICKS C. Attitudes about dental care among parents whose children suffer from severe congenital heart disease: a case‐control study. International journal of paediatric dentistry. 2006 Jul;16(4):231-8.
9. Guntheroth WG. How important are dental procedures as a cause of infective endocarditis?. The American journal of cardiology. 1984 Oct 1;54(7):797-801.
10. Hallett KB, Radford DJ, Seow WK. Oral health of children with congenital cardiac diseases: a controlled study. Pediatric dentistry. 1992 Jul 1;14(4):225.
11. Saunders CP, Roberts GJ. Dental attitudes, knowledge, and health practices of parents of children with congenital heart disease. Archives of disease in childhood. 1997 Jun 1;76(6):539-40.
12. Smith AJ, Adams D. The dental status and attitudes of patients at risk from infective endocarditis. British dental journal. 1993 Jan;174(2):59-64.
13. Suvarna R, Rai K, Hegde AM. Knowledge and oral health attitudes among parents of children with congenital heart disease. International journal of clinical pediatric dentistry. 2011 Jan;4(1):25.
14. Süzük S, Kaşkatepe BA, Çetin M. Antimicrobial susceptibility against penicillin, ampicillin and vancomycin of viridans group Streptococcus in oral microbiota of patients at risk of infective endocarditis. Infez Med. 2016 Sep 1;24(3):190-3.
15. Wilson W, Taubert KA, Gewitz M, Lockhart PB, Baddour LM, Levison M, Bolger A, Cabell CH, Takahashi M, Baltimore RS, Newburger JW. Prevention of infective endocarditis: guidelines from the American Heart Association: a guideline from the American Heart Association rheumatic fever, endocarditis and Kawasaki disease committee, council on cardiovascular disease in the young, and the council on clinical cardiology, council on cardiovascular surgery and anesthesia, and the quality of care and outcomes research interdisciplinary working group. The Journal of the American Dental Association. 2008 Jan 1;139:S3-24.
whatsapp